Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85240 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Men and makeup
Reply
 
Thread Tools
guyinrubbersuit
The Lotus Eater


Member 628

Level 30.15

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2006, 11:35 PM Local time: Oct 21, 2006, 09:35 PM #26 of 39
This is the only kind of makeup guys should wear:








Seriously though, I don't wear make up and don't ever intend to use it, outside of theatrical use. The most I go with skin care products are lotion and aftershave for my face. That's it. No fucking eyeliner, or lip balm, or nail polish or anything else. Just bullshit.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
sleipner
Rival


Member 2539

Level 7.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 21, 2006, 11:48 PM #27 of 39
i don't know...i never really counted moisturizing as make up. besides i need that. my face gets dry (like the gobi desert) if i don't do anything and acne gets bad if you don't do it too.

On the other hand, one of the substitute teachers at my former high school wore too much make up...his cheeks were basically purple and his eyelids blue. i did mention it was a he right? but yeah, i mean i wouldn't mind if the ancient egyptian look came back but a man that looks like a hooker is simply another matter.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Memento mori

Leknaat
Evil


Member 137

Level 34.72

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 12:13 AM #28 of 39
Alice hit the nail on the head.

The trick to make-up is to make it look like you're not wearing any. But aside from that....

I could really care less. If a man wants to wear make-up, then that's his perogative. The only time I have a problem is when it's too heavy. Dear God...it looks atrocious.

And for those who mentioned theatre and tv....Maybe you should mention that if natural light were as bright as stage lights, then the make-up would look okay away from the stage, too. That's why stage make-up is so "heavy" looking. When the lights hit a person who is NOT wearing any make-up he or she is totally washed out. No features--nothing. Make-up helps accentuate the features.

Gee, just like everyday make-up is supposed to do.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
Arkhangelsk
Good to see you, England


Member 524

Level 28.48

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 12:21 AM Local time: Oct 21, 2006, 11:21 PM #29 of 39
Eyeliner on guys is attractive, and I'm not talking gobs of it. Just a hint. There was a guy in one of my art classes that wore a hint of eyeliner and it just made him look gorgeous (ftr: he was straight, had a girlfriend, and was not really goth). If I guy knows what he's doing, subtle 'natural-look ' makeup is just as effective as on women.

However, I'm not really in favor of guys with foundation and powder, lipstick and blush. That's just...overdone.

Originally Posted by RAZGRIZ-3
Metrosexuality (aside from being a dumb term) is a horrible concept, and is the reason that so many women these days are wondering just where the men went. They turned into girls, that's where. I even know gay guys who think men wearing makeup is faggy.
The concept of manliness is totally a result of the culture. Just because today's "manly man" is supposed to have rough skin and calluses... men were 250% 'faggier' in the 1700s.

He was considered the epitome of maleness in his day (and quite proud of his legs -- hence the heels and tights).
Not that I would want to see a guy dressed like Louis XIV, but some eyeliner or a kilt isn't necessarily girlish.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Last edited by Arkhangelsk; Oct 22, 2006 at 12:25 AM.
Nahual
k'iskallawankitaj mamaykipis riman


Member 1931

Level 23.32

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 12:46 AM #30 of 39
Originally Posted by Leknaat
And for those who mentioned theatre and tv....Maybe you should mention that if natural light were as bright as stage lights, then the make-up would look okay away from the stage, too. That's why stage make-up is so "heavy" looking. When the lights hit a person who is NOT wearing any make-up he or she is totally washed out.
So that's the reason! I forgot why it was needed on stage, but yeah...
I miss that theater performance. It was one of the most fun times of my life..oops! Tangent!

Originally Posted by Arkhangelsk
The concept of manliness is totally a result of the culture. Just because today's "manly man" is supposed to have rough skin and calluses... men were 250% 'faggier' in the 1700s.

He was considered the epitome of maleness in his day (and quite proud of his legs -- hence the heels and tights).
Not that I would want to see a guy dressed like Louis XIV, but some eyeliner or a kilt isn't necessarily girlish.

Looks like I found my halloween costume.
Make weh, for King Jorge!

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Quiero ayudar a todos que viven en el mundo...pero empiezo contigo.



Metal Sphere
It's Agrias time.


Member 84

Level 36.59

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 02:10 AM #31 of 39
Wouldn't it be fair to compare the average men of then with their contemporaries?

FELIPE NO

The text is part of the image and the two squires aren't exactly even.
Little Brenty Brent Brent
Bulk's not everything. You need constant effort, too.


Member 235

Level 46.36

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 03:31 AM Local time: Oct 22, 2006, 12:31 AM #32 of 39
Originally Posted by Arkhangelsk
The concept of manliness is totally a result of the culture.
I'm glad we agree. Get this girly makeup shit outta here.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?
MageDie
Kaizoku ou!!!!!!!!


Member 13526

Level 2.00

Oct 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 04:23 AM Local time: Oct 22, 2006, 10:23 AM #33 of 39
I think that people must be at least well dressed and clean. physical beauty is natural but the most important is behaviour and spirit. But people can't see the inside so they are attracted by the outside.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
:afro:
nabhan
Good Chocobo


Member 679

Level 17.09

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 12:20 PM Local time: Oct 22, 2006, 01:20 PM #34 of 39
From a thread in TQP:

Originally Posted by Phoenix X
I find vanity to be something of a turnoff, so makeup is usually a bad thing, imo. The exception here is when it's done for effect and not to disguise the natural (natural is always beautiful, folks). Covering blemishes? Go fuck yourself. Goth and likin' the crazy eyeliner? FUCKING GO FOR IT!!! Deviations from the "norm" are probably my biggest turn-on!
I basically agree with this, although perhaps not to that extent. There's a difference between wearing lots of makeup to conceal bad features and wearing lots of makeup because of individual style.

Anyway, back on topic. Makeup for men? Aside from the fact that it's fucking makeup, they did a segment aobut this on Street Cents, and basically they all looked like shit.

Most amazing jew boots
Lunar Seal
i wish my grass was emo so it would cut itsself


Member 12670

Level 9.15

Sep 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 07:20 PM #35 of 39
I think foundation is going a little too far. I think men are supposed to be natural. But something like a tinted moisterizer would be okay, since it looks natural and has benefits for your skin. But honestly, I'd prefer men didn't get into cosmetics. It's okay to put lotion on and wear chapstick, but things like foundation, blush, etc should just be left for the women.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
guyinrubbersuit
The Lotus Eater


Member 628

Level 30.15

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 08:50 PM Local time: Oct 22, 2006, 06:50 PM #36 of 39
Originally Posted by Arkhangelsk
The concept of manliness is totally a result of the culture. Just because today's "manly man" is supposed to have rough skin and calluses... men were 250% 'faggier' in the 1700s.

He was considered the epitome of maleness in his day (and quite proud of his legs -- hence the heels and tights).
Not that I would want to see a guy dressed like Louis XIV, but some eyeliner or a kilt isn't necessarily girlish.

Only if you were in upper echelon of society, then it would ring true. Most of the men of the 1700s had to get down and dirty in order to work, at least in the country side and you know what happens when that happens? Your skin gets rougher because of the dirt, sun and other elements affecting it. And honestly, that's more regal and a display of power than a display of manliness, however a show of power and dominance is typically a male trait. If anything, men today are 250% faggier than the guys of the 1700s.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
Krusty69
Carob Nut


Member 13390

Level 6.55

Oct 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2006, 09:30 PM #37 of 39
I don't think it really matters if men should or should not wear make-up. If men want to wear it they probably will, and the fact is that men's skin probably needs something different than what women's skin needs from make-up.

I was speaking idiomatically.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion > Men and makeup

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.