[Multiplatform] Call of Duty 5, World At Bore

Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision (Minus Blizzard)
Release Date: November 11 / November 14


CoD5 will be using modified CoD4 engine. Meaning now you can shoot through walls with your M1 Grand!





Okay guys, PC beta started today and Xbox will start either today or tomorrow. I don't know about PS3.

Spoiler:

Quote:

Screenshoty z her, Obrázky z her - Call of Duty: World at War, - Recenzeher.eu

not sure how long these will be up since theyre leaked
Call Of Duty: World at War Screenshots Leaked | AnalogHype | 2008 - Guide For The Urban Gamer

trailer launched :
Gametrailers.com - Call of Duty: World At War - Full Length Debut Trailer HD

This is going to be fucking epic.


PS. Couldn't find any articles thats useful.

Discuss.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

AW YEAH SON TREYARCH BACK IN THE MOTHERFUCKING SADD-wait.

:biggestsadface:

There's nowhere I can't reach.

I'd be excited if Treyarch wasn't making it. Now I just have to sit back and see if it's any good once it comes out.

Most amazing jew boots

I know I'm the biggest loser ever for having this opinion, but I actually liked CoD3 way more than I liked CoD4 (as far as single player goes, anyway). Thus, I don't mind that Treyarch is developing it, and I prefer the move back to WWII.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

so what you are saying is that you have in fact, not grown tired of ww2 shooters despite the fact that there are about fifty of them out there now

I was speaking idiomatically.

Hey Kimchi, you're really pushing it with these OPs. Do the world a favour and improve them some before making more of them, eh?

That said, CoD3 was pretty fucking abysmal, so anyone being excited for this somewhat frightens me. The trailer looks like horseshit to boot, what a fucking surprise that is.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Originally Posted by Stealth

I'd be excited if Treyarch wasn't making it. Now I just have to sit back and see if it's any good once it comes out.

Has Treyarch made any good games lately? I am real dissappointed that infintyward isn't doing it I'd rather let Sega do it.

No! Ubisoft

FELIPE NO

Originally Posted by Tails

so what you are saying is that you have in fact, not grown tired of ww2 shooters despite the fact that there are about fifty of them out there now

Yes.

One of my most anticipated games at the moment is Brothers in Arms: Hell's Highway, which just goes to show that I'm a sucker for these things. I'm a history major, so sue me if I at least don't have a reason to find this stuff interesting.

Most amazing jew boots

You'd think a history major would be even MORE tired of the same thing repeated ad infinitum with various levels of factual inconsistency than someone who doesn't study it, no?

BiA at least has an interesting game mechanic going for it. I definitely can't say the most interesting thing about it is the setting.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

These are the bastards who don't even make PC ports, right? Ugh. I didn't miss out on CoD3. Although, I must say that this pisses me off. FINALLY, a Pacific War game and it'll probably be shit.

Pacific Theater strikes me as way more interesting than the European Theater, but it largely gets underplayed on attention. Oh well...

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Gechmir

These are the bastards who don't even make PC ports, right? Ugh. I didn't miss out on CoD3. Although, I must say that this pisses me off. FINALLY, a Pacific War game and it'll probably be shit.

Pacific Theater strikes me as way more interesting than the European Theater, but it largely gets underplayed on attention. Oh well...

I believe Metal of Honor did it already. It wasn't a great game by any means though.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by Gechmir

These are the bastards who don't even make PC ports, right? Ugh. I didn't miss out on CoD3. Although, I must say that this pisses me off. FINALLY, a Pacific War game and it'll probably be shit.

Pacific Theater strikes me as way more interesting than the European Theater, but it largely gets underplayed on attention. Oh well...

It's not only the Pacific. You can clearly see Germans in the trailers/screenshots.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Yep. Some missions will be European Theater, playing as Russia.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Ugh. Back to the WW2 theater. Still, wanna see how this will end up.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

I prefer the WW2 to the modern stuff, I think it more balanced and fun to have more slightly 'crappy' weapons. that way the rifles and snipers have an even chance too.

FELIPE NO

Originally Posted by RockgamerXIII

I know I'm the biggest loser ever for having this opinion, but I actually liked CoD3 way more than I liked CoD4 (as far as single player goes, anyway). Thus, I don't mind that Treyarch is developing it, and I prefer the move back to WWII.

I prefer the WW2 environment, but will expect that once again, the single player campaign to suck dong.

Also, OP, pre-rendered hardly counts as a worthy screenshot. Most of that "doesn't count." Glad to see that once again they're screwing their origins by neglecting the PC most likely.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Didn't spot Krauts. Guess I need to re-watch it, but... Meh.

Manny Biggs --
Yeah, I know Medal of Honor had a few Pacific games, but that series has been an embarrassment for years. I won't even acknowledge those "games" =x

Most amazing jew boots

Originally Posted by Colonel Skills

You'd think a history major would be even MORE tired of the same thing repeated ad infinitum with various levels of factual inconsistency than someone who doesn't study it, no?

But history is nothing but the same thing over and over again, so if I was tired of it I probably would have changed my major by now.

Seriously though, it's not like I play every single WWII game that comes out, or else I probably would be tired of them. The only ones I've really played are MoH (back in the early days, before it started to suck), BiA, and CoD.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Gechmir

These are the bastards who don't even make PC ports, right?

Originally Posted by Lukage

Glad to see that once again they're screwing their origins by neglecting the PC most likely.

I don't understand. Are you angry because you feel that a PC port won't be made? Every source I have read about this game has listed that there is a PC port.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

I find it odd to "port" it to the platform that it was originally designed for, but Treyarch didn't make Call of Duty 3 for the PC.

Most amazing jew boots

Call of Duty 3 was a decent enough game, but it's not a patch on 2 and 4 really, so Treyarch being back at the helm is a little concerning. That they've had 2 years to work on this gives me a little more hope, but then the fact that it's set in WWII (AGAIN) dashes most of that on the spot.

This could turn out to be a good game, but I'm not even the slightest bit excited about this title, which is crazy given it's the follow up to a fantastic game that I've ploughed copious hours into.

I was speaking idiomatically.

I'd love a FPS based on the Korean War or Vietnam. Vietcong was pretty fuckin' nice for its time, and the Korean War in itself largely gets ignored, but there are some pretty impressive battles/encounters that took place during its duration.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Originally Posted by Gechmir

I'd love a FPS based on Vietnam.

Korean war FPS? Nothing. But there are strategy games that relate.

FELIPE NO

They do have a Korean FPS, its called the first half of Crysis.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Great, just what we need, more WWII. I think I'll possibly rent it and choose to buy Battlefield: Bad Company. I don't know, I just prefer war games set in the future rather than the 50 billion titles that reflect on the past.

Jam it back in, in the dark.