Face or Body?

definitely face. the face is what you are looking at when you are talking to her.

the body is just a bonus....

of course, on top of this, everyone has different preferences for what constitutes a "pretty face", but in the end, i think the face is far more important.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

For me face is much more important than body. Imagine you're sleeping with her, look in her face and your little friend is calling out a retreat. I'm sorry for saying it so directly but isn't it true? (And no, you can't do it from behind everytime)

Of course, body should be within predefined proportions but if face is bad, there's no longer a serious chance.


Edit: But we shouldn't forget that the most beautiful woman is nothing if she had a personality like a zombie.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Originally Posted by Hamu-Sumo

(And no, you can't do it from behind everytime)

Yes, you can. Get the fuck out and come back when you know what you're talking about.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Originally Posted by Fresh Frank

Yes, you can. Get the fuck out and come back when you know what you're talking about.

You forgot the irony tags, my friend.

FELIPE NO

You're saying you can't fuck a girl from behind every time you do the deed.

But you can. So you're wrong.























What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Face is most important to me. Honestly it seems more times then not, if a girl has a nice face, she also has a nice body. It's not neccessarily true the other way around.

And honestly I'd think people kiss more often then they have sex and if someone is really freaking ugly. I don't know how you'd be able to stand to kiss them.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by DarkMageOzzie

If a girl has a nice face, she also has a nice body. It's not neccessarily true the other way around.

FAILURE

How ya doing, buddy?

Gee I love how you chopped off part of what I said to misquote me. But, whatever. At least I caused you to post something aside from that annoying face.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Fresh Frank

You're saying you can't fuck a girl from behind every time you do the deed.

But you can. So you're wrong.

Okay okay, you can do it. That's right. But it's unusual I guess. I mean, for me it would be boring to have sex in the same way eeeeverytime. Furthermore, imagine you're a great lover (beside from the fact you are one in reality or not, so don't get me wrong) and you are sleeping with a girl not for five minutes but, hm, let me say, 20 minutes or more. Would you do it only from behind for 20 minutes? Everytime? I don't believe.

Most amazing jew boots

Originally Posted by Hamu-Sumo

Furthermore, imagine you're a great lover and you are sleeping with a girl not for five minutes but, hm, let me say, 20 minutes or more. Would you do it only from behind for 20 minutes? Everytime? I don't believe.

Thank you for my morning laugh.

I will never understand why people continue to post about sex once they've been shown they have no idea what they are talking about.

I was speaking idiomatically.

I dunno...to approach a girl, Like many others have said, you'd have to be attracted to the whole package...and probably for me, from far off its the body. Then it would go to face.

But all in all, after the date, if her personality is that of a pencil...umm...bye?

-------------------------

And I agree with you on that Midna...seriously. If you can't really look at the girls face, you shouldn't be sleeping with her in the first place.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Body, come on. What kind of a question is this anyways. Anyone who's worth two fucking pennies would say body.

FELIPE NO

Personally the kind of body that I like has 3 legs, a cat's tail, four arms, two and a half eyes and at least five vaginas.

OK, now the internet knows about what I find attractive. Back to LARPing.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

er, both? i mean, seriously, even if she's a pretty face, her body doesn't quite turn u on, what the heck man? as for hot body, but u can't bear to even look at her, my gawd, no.

Generally it's alright if you're slightly plump or chubby, or if you aren't that cute a girl, but seriously, meet both minimum requirements please.

but comparatively, i'd say body. There's always a thing called a paper bag.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Well I'd say I'm pretty open but I like a decent face with good teeth of course, and a good or smaller body; but, I am going to have to agree with Webjay and say that qualities are so variant that I can break the statement I said before as long as she has at least a clear face. I've definately liked chubby/fat girls a few times based off of personality and such, which would come first, but I still would say I shoot for face first.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

My only prerequisite is that she plays the violin (or cello) as well or better than I play the piano, and that she loves classical music at least as much as I do.

Face and body are a distant second to that….

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by yevheniy

My only prerequisite is that she plays the violin (or cello) as well or better than I play the piano, and that she loves classical music at least as much as I do.

Face and body are a distant second to that….

So you're saying you would date the fattest, grossest, most heinous cunt on the face of the planet if she can play one of two specific instruments well?

Uh huh. You know what, Ludwig? You can fuck right off and never come back with this shit. I mean, seriously. Get a grip on yourself. The world doesn't benefit from your idiot romanticism bullshit. No, you wouldn't date a heffer because she can draw a bow across a string. So don't sit here and tell people you would. Or maybe the problem is that you can't pull a hot bird?

Either way, leave.



I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

I remember a guy saying basically the same thing last year. Basically someone who's such a fanboy for his hobby that it becomes a necessity for his partner to regard it as positively is someone who is better off becoming a crazy snake guy.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Maybe it's just me, but it has to be both body and face that are attractive to me. If you have an ugly face and a sexy body, then that person is still unnattractive to me. If a girl has a sexy face and an ugly body, it's still quite unnattractive to me. It has to be both or nothing.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Face first, body second. You can always excercise, burn off the fat and build muscle. Not as easy with a face.

FELIPE NO

Originally Posted by Hamu-Sumo

Edit: But we shouldn't forget that the most beautiful woman is nothing if she had a personality like a zombie.

Same thing goes for guys: You can be the most gorgeous man on earth, but all the women that I know wouldn't care about your ass if you're the last guy on earth if you're just a good for nothing son of a gun that can't even do his own dishes/laundry/take out the trash without being told/asked to do so.

What can I say, I've dated guys for looks and had my fun. When it comes to long-term commitment, I want a real man.

Currently I am in a long-term relationship so... yeah, I can't even fathom which aspects of "looks" I'd look for since my priority for boyfriends have always put physical attractiveness at the low end. (^^; It's always been more like, "Hey, he has a sense of humor, is not an idiot, and can cook a mean meal and he's cute to boot!" I have screwed up priorities, I know.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Originally Posted by Shorty

Same thing goes for guys: You can be the most gorgeous man on earth, but all the women that I know wouldn't care about your ass if you're the last guy on earth if you're just a good for nothing son of a gun that can't even do his own dishes/laundry/take out the trash without being told/asked to do so.

What can I say, I've dated guys for looks and had my fun. When it comes to long-term commitment, I want a real man.

Currently I am in a long-term relationship so... yeah, I can't even fathom which aspects of "looks" I'd look for since my priority for boyfriends have always put physical attractiveness at the low end. (^^; It's always been more like, "Hey, he has a sense of humor, is not an idiot, and can cook a mean meal and he's cute to boot!" I have screwed up priorities, I know.

I think anyone who really thinks about it would say something like that. No one wants to spend the rest of their life with someone that they can't stand just because they look good.

How ya doing, buddy?

To me face and feet are important. Girls can have a nice face but if their feet are all torn up it leads me to believe they live by the motto " if the face looks good, the rest can rot" thus why you come across girls with stinky vage.


I'm guessing I won't have to worry about this for awhile considering I found a girl who puts up with me and my antics.

Most amazing jew boots

First impression and most noticeable aspect - face. Unless they'd let everything or certain parts hang out then you'd notice that. Legs are the second most noticeable aspect for me.

Eventually after physical impressions, you have to settle on someone with a great and fun personality. A great conversationalist.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

It depends on the guy. for me it's the face. I mean she could have the best boddy ever but I am more for classic beauty, so if she is unbelievably cute with a beautiful smile then thats all she needs.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?