|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
When Speilberg made that comment about using as little CG as possible, I was very skeptical.
For the most part they probably used the CG where they said they would - in the environments (like how FX were used in making the storm form over the dig site in Raiders), but the criticism of the CG is when they use it when it's not necessary - I think like in the car chase next to the cliff, and those four tall pillars moving inward in the trailer. The CG and the story isn't really what I'm worried about. When I heard that they were basing Indy IV on the B-Grade sci fi pictures of the 50s, I knew it wasn't going to be AS good as when they were based on 30s TV serials.... Its the parts in the reviews where they say 'there's no real sense of danger'. We'll just have to see for ourselves when it comes out. Jam it back in, in the dark. |