 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 945 Level 11.22 Mar 2006 
|
Going off of about 15 years of history, if Intel chips are 20% more powerful than AMD's equivalent chips, that means that they'll also be 200% more expensive, or they'll have horrible chip yields, or they'll try to stuff RDRAM, bad chipsets, or some other horrible proprietary technology down everyone's throats. If Intel can resist pricing theirselves out of the market for once, I'll be more impressed.
we need new Cyrix chips, or something.  Jam it back in, in the dark. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Can't install OS X into Intel MacBook :( | Paco | Help Desk | 0 | Jul 21, 2008 08:15 PM |
| Amd Athlon x64 vs Intel Core 2 Duo (for laptop) | eriol33 | Help Desk | 11 | Apr 23, 2008 04:11 AM |
| Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 and motherboard compatibility | iamamoogle | Help Desk | 2 | Oct 9, 2006 09:05 PM |
Relic