First PS3 Screenshots Leaked: Untold Legends 3 (uh oh..)

Originally Posted by Cetra

This game is being made by the same team that did the Everquest Online Adventure game for the PS2. Their graphical team is horrible and it's pretty obvious these people just need to stop making games.

This pretty much sums it up. I'd rather not fetch a screenshot of their PS2 work, lest I get seizures from graphics that barely surpass those of Mort the Chicken, but these guys really don't put an effort into their games. Notice how the little realtime footage we saw at E3 and TGS last year (Warhawk, HS, MGS4, I-8) surpasses this shit by leaps and bounds.

And that's on alpha kits.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Zeo

MGS4 wasn't gameplay.

MGS4 was realtime, that was a main point of the trailer was to poke fun at the people who were going to inevitably say it was CG. Shit, they even manipulated every little aspect via the code in front of everyone after the demo.

Quote:

It was, what they claimed, to be a teaser using the PS3 engine.

I-8 was a teaser and that was realtime and it looks better than this. Same goes for Heavenly Sword. Point is, these guys are turning out crap since even barebones Warhawk had more going on (water, physics, actual gameplay, enemies, etc) and still it was far more refined.

Quote:

And DMC4 was CGI.

And so was RE5. They've already said that beside a few effects present within the teasers that they're both the minimum of what they want to achieve. Looking at GRAW and FN3, I definitely believe them.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Megalith

This is Fighting Force 3, right.

Why do you honor that series by talking about it? BTW, these shots were originally 1080p according to the site that leaked them, that'd explain the smooth (but ridiculously plain models and environments).

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Maybe it'll be like the Xbox 360's HDD where you can store more maps for games or skins or something? If they're telling developers to make games assuming the HDD is present, we may see something more substantial than that though.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by Megalith

The hard drive will be required...if you want games to load as quickly as possible. It's as simple as that.

Hardly a reason for a game to require a drive, and it's unlikely that'll be the extent that it's used given what we've seen with the 360.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Originally Posted by Elixir

Well considering that the Gamecube already has a modem in it and the xbox is the same, I feel sort of cheated when Sony released the PS2 without one.

Why, given that the specs were finalized in late 1999 and even when the console launched, broadband wasn't exactly the big thing it is now. Needless to say, Sony got caught with it's pants down during this transition.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?