Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


X-Men 3
Reply
 
Thread Tools
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2006, 09:02 PM #1 of 356
Kickass! This movie was awesome. Like any other movie it had it's good parts and bad parts

Pros:

Spoiler:
-The final battle
-Seeing Rebecca Romijn naked
-"Do you know I am? I'm the Juggarnaut *****!"
-Every scene with Beast in it. Especially the final battle
-Iceman finally getting in this ice form
-Multiple Man tricking the soldiers
-Everything with Phoenix(She kinda creeped me out)
-Wolverine kicking that guy in the balls and saying "Grow those back."
-The scene after the credits


Cons:

Spoiler:
-Not very much screentime for Angel. They made it seem like he was gonna have a bigger role.
-No Colossus vs Juggarnaut fight
-Juggarnaut getting beat by running into a wall
-Cyclops' death. I knew he wasn't gonna have a big role and that he was gonna die. I just didn't expect it to be that early in the movie.
-Colossus not having very many lines(I think he only had one.)
-Psylocke getting killed. WTF? Why?!
-The movie being too short. I think it should have been at least 20 minutes longer.


Jam it back in, in the dark.

Last edited by KCJ506; May 26, 2006 at 10:43 PM.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2006, 09:42 PM #2 of 356
Originally Posted by Gechmir
A spoiler would've been appreciated on your list of Con's, KCJ506.
Sorry. I'm trying to edit it and make it so you can hide spoilers, but I don't how.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 27, 2006, 07:22 AM #3 of 356
When did Jubilee appear in this move? I saw her name in the credits but I don't remember seeing her at all.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2006, 02:06 AM #4 of 356
Check out the box office

Wow it even beat Spider-man 2!

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime...ge=open&p=.htm

Most amazing jew boots
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2006, 01:56 AM #5 of 356
http://www.superherohype.com/news/x-mennews.php?id=4329

Quote:
New Details on the X-Men Spinoffs
Source: USA Today June 1, 2006

USA Today has published an update on the various "X-Men" spinoffs in the works, including Wolverine, Magneto, one on the kids and another on Emma Frost. The newspaper's scoop:

The first spinoff will be Hugh Jackman's Wolverine. His character has an as-yet-unrevealed back story in which researchers replaced his original bones with a metal skeleton. Jackman has signed on to star and co-produce, and X-Men producer Lauren Shuler Donner says it will likely head into production next year.

"We've also talked about doing something on the kids in (Professor X's) school, focusing on their lives, and less of a global adventure for the team," says Hutch Parker, production president of 20th Century Fox.

The studio is also exploring a movie with Three Kings director David O. Russell based on the character of Emma Frost, a sexy mutant telepath who can transform her skin into diamonds. She is an X-Men comics regular but was not featured in the movies.

Another likely solo project: Magneto, also in the script phase. The film will focus on his youthful pre-villain days, Shuler Donner says.

Though it would require a younger actor for those sequences, she says the film would need Ian McKellen to anchor the flashbacks. "What's a Magneto movie without Ian?" she asks.

We'll be following all the projects closely.
Just how many spinoffs are they planning to do? We've got Wolverine, Magneto, and now Emma Frost who hasn't even appeared in the movies. I remember reading about them planning to do a Mystique movie.

Why so many spinoffs and not X4? Damn you Fox.

If Emma Frost gets a spinoff, then damn it I want my Nightcrawler movie.

I was speaking idiomatically.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 03:07 AM #6 of 356
I think a great many of the people who put X3 down made up their minds the minute Singer bailed. I was just reading where Ratner was talking about how that guy Knowles from AICN used to praise him for the "Rush Hour" movies but just seemed to turn on him out of the blue.

What's funny to me is that a lot of people complained about the lack of action in Singer's movies and they wanted an all-out mutant vs mutant power slugfest people have been clamoring since the first film. In X3 we get more action and mutant vs mutant fight and a lot of them still aren't happy.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 04:57 AM #7 of 356
Originally Posted by Bradylama
You are retarded. I actually watched the first two movies for the first time in anticipation of this movie because I thought it would be so awesome.

I now know the truth.
Holy crap dude. Lighten up. It's the truth. There were people already bashing the movie before Ratner even signed on to direct it.

People who don't like it seem to for one good reason or two somewhat lame reasons.

1.They feel it was really a bad movie overall (which is fine if thats your opinion).

or..

2.They decided they hate before they saw it because they hate Ratner and/or love Singer.

3.They are hardcore Cyclops fans and are not happy with how that one character was handled in the film.

...of course there are some other reasons but those seem to be the three biggest. I liked it for the most part (for the record).

Just wait until Superman Returns comes up and most of the X3 critics will be giving it blind praises.

Most amazing jew boots

Last edited by KCJ506; Jun 3, 2006 at 05:00 AM.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 05:16 AM #8 of 356
Originally Posted by Bradylama
And you had your gay little montage avatar before the movie came out. Was that supposed to mean I should have expected your irrelevant defense?

How does a pre-developed bias dispute the fact that this movie was objectively bad?
Dude knock it off. I know you're a mod and all, but seriously grow the hell up. If didn't like the movie that's fine. That's your opinion You don't have to jump down my throat just because I liked it.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Last edited by KCJ506; Jun 3, 2006 at 05:19 AM.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 04:56 PM #9 of 356
I've noticed a lot of people complaining about X3 not following the comics when there are movies that didn't follow the comics storylines and a lot of people still liked them. It's okay for the Joker to kill Bruce Wayne's parents or Superman to build his Fortress by throwing a crystal into some snow, but when a modern movie deviates we get relentless complaining.

This is driving me crazy how a lot of people are so pissed off about X-3 not following the comics, when X-2 didn't and X-1 didn't but they were great.. and Batman Begins OBVIOUSLY ignored everything that had to do with the comics and yet people love that movie so I'm confused on that part.

Why are people singling Ratner out for the changes in this movie? For example people are complaining that Juggernaut was a mutant in the movie when he wasn't in the comics: Why weren't there similar complaints about Deathstrike laid at Singer during X2 (she was a human who became a cyborg in efforts to kill wolverine because she wanted his adamantium which she DID NOT HAVE, and she didn't have a healing factor either)?

So they didn't make references between Juggernaut and Xavier being stepbrothers, Singer ignored the fact that Wolverine and Sabertooth actually knew each other before Logan got involved with the X-Men, or the fact that Singer NEVER made any connection between Rogue and Mystique (who was a foster mother to Rogue in the comics) or even the fact that Mystique was Nightcrawler's mother in X2? Or the fact that Jean Grey was a doctor in the first X-Men, Bobby was not a child in training when Logan joined the X-Men (he was an original X-Man) and supposed to be from the South? Or that Mystique was never a flunkie for Magneto, and Striker wasn't a U.S Soldier, etc. I find that hypocritical.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2006, 09:57 PM #10 of 356
With all the spinoffs they have planned we probably won't be getting X4 until at least 2010.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2006, 02:55 AM #11 of 356
Am I the only one who thinks that Multiple Man should have gotten more screentime. I clearly remember early set reports stating that there was gonna be a fight between Wolverine and Multiple Man. WTF happened?!

It would be a cool fight because it would allow Wolverine to kill him dozens of times, it would be violent but neverending. Also I thought in the forest scene he was gonna fight Madrox, I was expecting him to randomly kill a dupe, then kill another. Finally after a few I thought he would say something like " Haven't I killed you like 5 times already?"

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Last edited by KCJ506; Jun 5, 2006 at 03:05 AM.
KCJ506
Fuck you assholes


Member 809

Level 13.21

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 9, 2006, 01:40 AM #12 of 356
I'm still wondering why the hell did they make Psylocke a villain? Why did they even include her in the movie at all? It's really weird a character that appeared at the beggining in the church, with main brotherhood ones like Callisto and Arclight suddenly dissappeared during the rest of the film until the end, in one of the latest scenes, the lab one. Don't you think?

The problem is they never established to be an important character. They never established her connections with Magneto's cause......or even with Callisto, Quill, and Arclight.....

So her presence makes no sense. It seems they cut out the meat of her character's screentime. Why not cut the character out completely?

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre > X-Men 3

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Research suggests men are clueless when it comes to women. Wall Feces The Quiet Place 46 Apr 9, 2008 07:46 PM
[Movie] Children of Men: The TV Series Matt Media Centre 7 Apr 9, 2008 03:00 PM
[Multiplatform] Kane & Lynch: Dead Men Simo Video Gaming 10 Nov 18, 2007 12:57 AM
Men and makeup Chibi Neko General Discussion 38 Oct 22, 2006 09:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.