|
Originally Posted by chaofan
Sigh...
Wii kicks serious arse and the potential of the console is mind-boggling, but the FRICKING media (well, the newspapers I've been reading) doesn't seem to take note or even look at what Nintendo have been doing.
[HERALD SUN - The Australian (Melbourne) Tabloid Newspaper]
-Around 15 paragraphs. 6 to X360, 5 to PS3, 2 to Wii.
To add to the injury, some "professional" had a say in Nintendo's plan, "Although the Wii will have a lot of features, the PS3 will still lead because it simply looks better in terms of graphics." What kind of F**ker is that? Hasn't she seen the DS?
[THE AGE - The Australian (Melbourne) Spreadsheet Newspaper]
-Around 38 paragraphs. 12 to X360, 12 to PS3, 11 to Wii
A bit better, a bit more unbiased, but have a look at the "Best of E3"!! Assassin's Creed (PS3), Viva (Pinata), Crackdown (360) and Crysis (PC). They included Mario Galaxy and Spore, two games in which I would agree with but most of it were games to do with extreme violence. WTH!!!
[MX - The Australian (Melbourne) Free Tabloid Newspaper]
-Around 12 paragraphs. 5 to X360, 5 to PS3, 2 to Wii
The title is "Nintendo, Wii Love It"... But what's this? Only two paragraphs and a photo of Shiggy playing Steven Spielberg in Wii Sports? Bleh. And then the rest of it talks about the upcoming games on X360 and PS3, almost all of which are violent or "Mature".
Why so much bias? There were as much things to talk about in the Nintendo section as there were in Sony's and Microsoft's.
|
Yep, it's pretty obvious why though, Nintendo just doesn't have the marketing and presence here, while Sony and MS could get the front page just by opening their pockets. That's how the media works though. Sony could get shit in a paper bag advertised by almost every news outlet, Nintendo Australia can only afford to give away a free GBA SP in K-Zone.
Jam it back in, in the dark.