Strategy Game of the Year?

What's unbalanced about AoE III? Maybe you need the latest patch...

It's a great game. It doesn't have the feel of AoK... but I guess that's just my perception. It's very well done... and the home city cards thing was a good addition; motivates players to improve their ability with one civilization.

If you want fast paced games, you should play EA's Red Alert 2. 0 Strategy, but hell, it's fun!

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by SouthJag

Admittedly, Age of Empires 3 is quite a bit different from the previous two Empires games and Age of Mythology. It's still good, but I had a hard time adjusting to the new pace. AoE 3 moves a lot faster as far as getting to the next age and basically ending the skirmish.

Well, that's true. I remember games in AoK lasting like 2 hours. And it was more unbalanced than AoE III. Ever seen 10 Mamelukes attack a Teutonic Knight at the same time and only take about 25% of its hitpoints? Or a bunch of Huskarls take down a castle?

Of course that... games in AoE III *are* shorter, really. Either you win fast, or die fast. Hmm... It *is* possible to reach a new age in like one minute and a half. :/

And The Titans was great... one of the worse things they did to AoE III was imitate the campaign style of AoM. Not making historical campaigns, that is.

Sheesh... now that I think about it... AoE III isn't *that* great. ¬_¬

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Taegueki

Sorry I don't touch EA shits. And yes I do have latest patch

'kay. Then look at it as a game made by Westwood. They made it; EA put its logo.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.