Clerks 2! ...they still don't like you.

Much like Terminator 3 - do we really need this movie, especially so late in the game? For a director so many people think is witty and intelligent, a sequel to a long-ago movie shows a lack of steam on his part.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by acid

He doesn't have to make this movie at all. It'll be a moderate success, probably make back it's costs but not a whole lot more. It's hardly going to be the box office smash of the summer.

I disagree. The internet has bolstered what was a rather mildly entertaining movie into some fucking monolith of our generation because it's full of goddamned pop culture references.

Look at the worthless morons who like Boondock Saints? These two movies are equally painful - yet people on the internet love them and support them enough to give them repeat DVD business.

I fear that you are wrong in the worst way possible.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by bioeng

I'm looking forward to this film regardless of the facts: it is no longer in black 'n white (ridding itself of its avant garde status), Smith over-milking the Clerks franchise, Rosario Dawson sticking out like a sore thumb.

I don't think you have any understanding of what "avant garde" means

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Capo

Jeff Anderson heard about this, and said he'd love to put something like "'This is the first movie I've walked out of in thirty years!' - Joel Siegel" on the movie poster.

It's been done. When Siskel and Ebert gave Lost Highway two thumbs down, David Lynch put out a poster with their reviews with a big, yellow headline TWO MORE REASONS TO SEE LOST HIGHWAY.

How ya doing, buddy?