[Movie] Spider-Man 3

Originally Posted by Megalith

I already know that Gwen Stacy's death is what causes Peter to tear off the symbiote in the bell tower.

Hey - remember all those crappy, inane posts that got you banned from the Superman Returns thread?

I want to see you get tossed out of here for the same shit, so keep up the good work, soldier!

There's nowhere I can't reach.

FROM IMDB

Fans attending the Comic-Con convention in San Diego Saturday were treated to a look at footage from next summer's Spider-Man 3 that included both animated and live-action scenes. They also were able to talk to Director Sam Raimi, producer Laura Ziskin and stars Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Topher Grace, Bryce Dallas Howard and Thomas Haden Church. Maguire's suggestion that Spider-Man 3 will not become the final installment in the franchise was greeted with thunderous applause. "We're going to leave it open-ended," he said, "If there are stories worth telling, then we'll tell them."

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Well, the fact that Toby said it denotes that he'd be involved.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by Cyrus XIII

I do hope though, that this would go for both, cast and crew. The Lethal Weapon series for example would not have aged nearly as well as it did, if Donner and Silver had left at some point.

There is an ernest and quite correct arguement to be made that the third and fourth installments of the Lethal Weapon series are pale, sickly follow-ups to two excellent movies. (I believe LW4 bombed terribly and was lambasted by critics)

Most amazing jew boots

I saw that poster on IMDB. I'm somewhat in disbelief that it's either legit (though I'm also too damned lazy to check on the offical Spider-Man site) or anything from the movie it's, given that I've seen blind plumbers create better photoshop effects than that.

That awful, crappy "Superman" pose that was supposedly a Spider-Man 3 poster only enforces this idea. I'll chalk it up as an overenthusiastic fanboy with a complete lack of artistic talent.

And in other news - Zatoichi is fucking awesome, Worm.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by BIGWORM

There's another of Emo Peter pulling his jacket to unveil the Venom suit.

Yeah, thats the poster I was refering to with "that awful, crappy "Superman" pose".

Originally Posted by BIGWORM

Did the Symbiote ever have a green tint to it? That throws me off, because in the animated series it had a purple tint to it.

I think thats simply a matter of artistic preference. Erik Larson didn't draw Venom exactly like Todd McFarlane, nor did Mark Bagley draw him like either of them.

Originally Posted by BIGWORM

I'm glad other people recognize Zatoichi besides myself.

I've only seen The Blind Swordsman's Revenge on IFC, which was fantastic. I want to see the "new" Zatoichi movie - it came out two years ago?

FELIPE NO

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling

And this has to do with Spider-man how?

Don't troll.

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling

What's all this talk of a "crappy" photoshop job. I'd challenge anybody here to do better.

http://www.frazettaartgallery.com/
http://www.davedorman.com/
http://www.drewstruzan.com/

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Originally Posted by BIGWORM

Thank you. You'd figure with the budget that Spider-man 3 has, they'd do a better job with the photoshops.

Why photoshop? Not that I need ANOTHER Alex Ross poster, but theres so much better talent out there than yet another 20 something on a Mac.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling

None of those guys use PS to create photorealistic images. They're all traditional painters. So you're saying you want Alex Ross to do the movie posters in traditional media? From what I remember, all of the Spidey posters have had a photorealistic style to them. They're just keeping the same style.

1.) You said you challenged anyone to do better - but not using what medium.

2.) I can EASILY argue that Frazetta is more photorealistic than anything you can dish up. His material is at the height of movement - all you're looking for are cheap CG gimicks and lens flair.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by MetheGelfling

all digital.

All by hand

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

A little overblown but still pretty good. I'm about as interested in the whole Venom aspect of the story as I am watching bathroom paint peel but I'll run with it after the excellence that was the last Spider-Man installment.

Harry Osborne may prove disappointing though. I don't think they have the character's best moments in mind from what this trailer has shown.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by The Furious One

Lookey what I found, has anyone heard this?

It's fake. Young hasn't even started on the movie, as he's still finishing up material for Ghost Rider. Spider-Man 3 will be recorded in the spring.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by Protom@nNeo

Having had to endure the lackluster reviews and internet backlash for several days lowered my expectations.

Ehh, keep in mind that everyone on the internet thinks that they have a valid opinion when some of them struggle to get a GED. The internet isn't really the place where educated people met up like it was in the 70s - you'll find the general population on it would be only educated enough to be picking lint out of a sock machine if this was 1944.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Originally Posted by Prime Blue

I'm not into Spider-Man very much, so could someone please explain how he took pictures of himself before having a relationship with Mary Jane

I'm not sure what you're refering to - but the Peter Parker character has long had a time-delay shutter on his camera (or, for more whiz-bang for your buck, a device on his belt that clicks the shutter whenever he passes in front of the camera lens). He just webs it to a wall and does whatever he does...

Originally Posted by Prime Blue

How/Why was Sandman created?

I... assume you missed about 10 minutes of the movie, as Marko is chased by police and he falls into the partical accelerator?

Originally Posted by Prime Blue

"we can always choose to do what's right"-thing, this stupid Hollywood morals are just ridiculous and I really hate it when movies use them. "Be a good boy, love is the greatest thing in the world", "Bla, bla, bla, filler lines".

You obviously know very little about the character, so I'll leave this one alone.

Originally Posted by Prime Blue

That combined with the all-too predictable plot... made it just your everyday American movie.

You just sound jaded here. Can you legitimize any of your complaints or are you simply going to list them off, in the hopes that others odd their head in agreement with empty ideas?

Originally Posted by Prime Blue

Also: Why do all red-haired women taste like strawberries?

As a matter of personal investigation I can tell you they don't.

Also: Stop quoting Goldeneye.

FELIPE NO