Salty for Salt's Sake

Member 27

Level 61.14

Mar 2006

|
Jan 2, 2008, 09:40 PM
Local time: Jan 2, 2008, 08:40 PM
|
2
#1 of 9
|
All right, I had to read this like six times to even remotely get an understanding of what the fuck you were trying to get at. And that little bit of prose? "Mouths tied and bodies twisted"? Seriously? Like, not even in an ironic way? What are you, like, 15?
Also, Huxley wasn't concerned with the relationship, he was concerned about the concept of government controlled sexuality. He wasn't poking fun at marriage, he was poking fun at what happens when you let the government sanction what happens in the bedrooms of the people, even if that's by making them fuck a lot.
Now, as to your point, a marriage based entirely on sex will never hold up. Because fucking gets old. Doesn't matter how many years you mix things up by adding new things, new people, new approaches, sex will only be so fresh for so long. You'd best be damned skippy you can tolerate looking at that person over a coffee table when you're not fucking them on it if you want to get married.
At the heart of this question is "Does anyone ever marry purely for fucking?" And I'm sure the answer is yes, and maybe they find out that their compatible after the fact, but I guaran-damn-tee you that if fucking is all that you have in a marriage, you'll be miserable. You can have a relationship based around fucking, but marriage is a long, boring-ass time to put up with someone when they're not sucking your cock.
How ya doing, buddy?
John Mayer just asked me, personally, through an assistant, to sing backup on his new CD.
|