 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 21 Level 28.54 Feb 2006 
|
I don't get why anyone wants this. Does anyone really need ratings to tell them whether a member is good or not? Try going to the journals page and you'll find out pretty well who is liked and who isn't by whom. That's pretty much all it's used for, anyway. In that respect, I find the rating system to be redundant.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Member 21 Level 28.54 Feb 2006
|
I would have a 4.385960483745834, most likely. Which is, of course, significantly better than a mere 4.38. Clearly marking me as superior to any such user.
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Member 21 Level 28.54 Feb 2006
|
If we bring it back, can we change it so it's more meaningful and less ridiculous? We don't need ratings of 1-5. Anything besides 1, 3 and 5 is meaningless. We should just have "Good, Average and Sucks" or something. And nothing with 15 decimal places after it. Just base what they get on a histogram of votes, kinda like the way professors decide what grade you get in a class.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Minion