 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 2001 Level 17.98 Mar 2006 
|
Yes it does. It encodes the file to the best of it's ability, and therefore loses a little bit here and there. Just because it preserved something last time, doesn't mean that it won't drop it this time. It's unfortunate.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
|
Member 2001 Level 17.98 Mar 2006
|
That's true, if you use the same source it'll be the same each time. The source is not the same with a re-endoding process.
I assumed you meant encoding a song, then re-encoding the song with the same codec. This loses information because the source is no longer as whole as the original was. It then compresses this already compressed file again, and loses a bit more quality. Each time the file is re-encoded you'll lose something. There's nowhere I can't reach.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
|
