Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/index.php)
-   Help Desk (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Shaving seconds off MP3s? (http://www.gamingforce.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6960)

Arbok Jun 2, 2006 08:28 PM

Shaving seconds off MP3s?
 
I was wondering if anyone knew of a quick way to shave seconds (either at the end or start of a track, depending) off of a mp3 without taking a hit in quality?

In times past, when I needed to do this either by request or for a project, I have often just done so with Soundforge... although I would wager that I have been losing quality on the files when doing it this way.

Basil Jun 2, 2006 08:31 PM

There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality. So, in your case, I would convert the mp3 to a WAV (or a lossless format), edit it, and then convert it back into an mp3. You still lose quality, though.

LiveTendiser Jun 2, 2006 10:14 PM

I'd recommend Mp3DirectCut. Quick, easy, and directly cuts the mp3.

Arainach Jun 3, 2006 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue_Kirby2
There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality. So, in your case, I would convert the mp3 to a WAV (or a lossless format), edit it, and then convert it back into an mp3. You still lose quality, though.

I just felt like pointing out that WAV itself is a lossless format. Everything you said is completely true, however.

Bodomi Jun 3, 2006 12:17 PM

Ary, that is a mistake I could have made myself.
I am quite sure he meant to say "or any lossless format".

Rock Jun 3, 2006 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blue_Kirby2
There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality.

That's just plain wrong and I'm irritated by Arainach even supporting this false conclusion.

As LiveTendiser correctly pointed out, MP3DirectCut allows you to edit any MP3 directly, without the need to re-encode the file and losing quality. It's easy to use and works like a charm.

Basil Jun 3, 2006 12:51 PM

Wow, really? I gotta try it out and see for myself then...

Arbok Jun 3, 2006 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveTendiser
I'd recommend Mp3DirectCut. Quick, easy, and directly cuts the mp3.

Awesome, thanks for the link! You are a life saver!

quazi Jun 3, 2006 08:51 PM

Quick question that's almost on topic: does encoding a file multiple times at the same bitrate with the same codec degrade it's quality each time?

PUG1911 Jun 3, 2006 09:13 PM

Yes it does. It encodes the file to the best of it's ability, and therefore loses a little bit here and there. Just because it preserved something last time, doesn't mean that it won't drop it this time. It's unfortunate.

quazi Jun 3, 2006 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PUG1911
Yes it does. It encodes the file to the best of it's ability, and therefore loses a little bit here and there. Just because it preserved something last time, doesn't mean that it won't drop it this time. It's unfortunate.

Well it's my understanding that if you encoded two full quality identical songs, you should get the same encoded song because they use an algorithmic process. I didn't think it was random.

PUG1911 Jun 4, 2006 01:08 AM

That's true, if you use the same source it'll be the same each time. The source is not the same with a re-endoding process.

I assumed you meant encoding a song, then re-encoding the song with the same codec. This loses information because the source is no longer as whole as the original was. It then compresses this already compressed file again, and loses a bit more quality. Each time the file is re-encoded you'll lose something.

quazi Jun 4, 2006 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PUG1911
That's true, if you use the same source it'll be the same each time. The source is not the same with a re-endoding process.

I assumed you meant encoding a song, then re-encoding the song with the same codec. This loses information because the source is no longer as whole as the original was. It then compresses this already compressed file again, and loses a bit more quality. Each time the file is re-encoded you'll lose something.

OK thanks, that was my question.

reflectiVe Jun 5, 2006 06:17 PM

I used "WavePad" to cut out things. Worked perfectly ever time I used it. I also use it to make custom ringtones...but that's just me. Anyway, I haven't used anything else but it's pretty easy to use.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.