|
Originally Posted by Devoxycontin
Also this statistic seems a little odd, do they consider sex before a 2nd marriage and outside of the first, pre-marital sex?
|
I would say yes, they probably do. By its definition, pre-marital sex is sex that occurs outside of wedlock. One could be divorced and still have pre-marital sex, presuming that the possibility of a second marriage exists, which it usually does.
"Pre-marital sex" is just a nicey-nice way of saying "adultery".
|
Originally Posted by Capo
And, yet, the government does so every single day.
|
You're overgeneralizing for the sake of beating a straw man, Capo. Not every government agency is concerned with your sex life. I doubt the Customs Bureau really cares where you stick your dick.
It's only certain agencies, and particular people within those agencies who possess an agenda, as Devo mentioned, that create a fuss over sex.
See, free sex is bad for the U.S. government. They like to hide behind morality and disease control. But really, it's tax code that makes the government care. If everyone could just have sex whenever, why, there'd be no need for marriage! If there was no need for marriage, then nobody would need to pay for marriage licenses! And then how would the government monitor you for taxation purposes? Ever notice how almost every important form has a section pertaining to your marital status, as if that somehow affects your ability to write a check? It's statistics. Nothing else. If the government couldn't tax you for being in a relationship, it wouldn't care with whom you slept.
There's nowhere I can't reach.