Well, the most important part is this:
|
Quote:
Under a ruling this month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, such surveillance -- which does not capture the content of the communications -- can be conducted without a wiretap warrant, because internet users have no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the data when using the internet.
|
The evidence they collected wouldn't be admissible under the search warrant if they had collected
what he was doing, they were only allowed to track that he was doing something.
If they wanted to find out what he was doing, they would have required a wiretap warrant, which isn't much different from tapping someone's phone.
Jam it back in, in the dark.