|
That doesn't appear to be English. Please try again.
|
What I mean is this.
|
Well, she had to make it a joke. Otherwise, every shitty things she mentioned could be a Damoclaes sword for herself.
|
Just imagine if she said it seriously. The words she's saying would just hit herself when the whole bunch of fans started to get annoyed because of Dumbledore's hidden facts, which is indeed disturbing. By turning it into a joke, less people will consider it seriously, and so, the chance for Rowling to have her fans feel ruined is less than 1.
|
The strange thing is why would she mentioned him gay? The whole story would just fit in, whether Dumbledore is straight, a gay, or a bisexual. She personally shattered the good image of this character in front of her fans...and that's not good for anyone.
|
We judge a book (well, at least me and my pals) by what it is, by what it tells, and by the fact about the story written, not by additions made after the whole story finished. The truth is that Harry Potter's story will just go on, disposing Dumbledore's sexual references.
If in those seven books, a quote about Dumbledore's being a gay is mentioned, so it does. But unfortunately, the news about it is not mentioned even once in the thick books with more than one million words.
So does it make any differences in the story? No. The only things created by the news Rowling announced are only more hatred from the Christian fanatics and questions whether Dumbledore did something Harry and other male characters or not.
And that's a complete disturbance.
You know this one. No explanations needed.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.