Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85241 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Shaving seconds off MP3s?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Arbok
Toho Mikado


Member 325

Level 9.20

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2006, 08:28 PM #1 of 14
Shaving seconds off MP3s?

I was wondering if anyone knew of a quick way to shave seconds (either at the end or start of a track, depending) off of a mp3 without taking a hit in quality?

In times past, when I needed to do this either by request or for a project, I have often just done so with Soundforge... although I would wager that I have been losing quality on the files when doing it this way.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
Basil
Banned


Member 499

Level 48.58

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2006, 08:31 PM Local time: Jun 2, 2006, 07:31 PM #2 of 14
There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality. So, in your case, I would convert the mp3 to a WAV (or a lossless format), edit it, and then convert it back into an mp3. You still lose quality, though.

Most amazing jew boots
LiveTendiser
Holdin Strong


Member 5978

Level 6.41

Apr 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 2, 2006, 10:14 PM #3 of 14
I'd recommend Mp3DirectCut. Quick, easy, and directly cuts the mp3.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Arainach
Sensors indicate an Ancient Civilization


Member 1200

Level 26.94

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 12:02 AM #4 of 14
Originally Posted by Blue_Kirby2
There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality. So, in your case, I would convert the mp3 to a WAV (or a lossless format), edit it, and then convert it back into an mp3. You still lose quality, though.
I just felt like pointing out that WAV itself is a lossless format. Everything you said is completely true, however.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
Bodomi
Perkele


Member 2202

Level 11.66

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 12:17 PM Local time: Jun 3, 2006, 07:17 PM #5 of 14
Ary, that is a mistake I could have made myself.
I am quite sure he meant to say "or any lossless format".

I was speaking idiomatically.
Rock
Rock me


Member 66

Level 29.37

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 12:46 PM Local time: Jun 3, 2006, 07:46 PM #6 of 14
Originally Posted by Blue_Kirby2
There's no possible way to edit mp3s (or any lossy format) without losing quality.
That's just plain wrong and I'm irritated by Arainach even supporting this false conclusion.

As LiveTendiser correctly pointed out, MP3DirectCut allows you to edit any MP3 directly, without the need to re-encode the file and losing quality. It's easy to use and works like a charm.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
Basil
Banned


Member 499

Level 48.58

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 12:51 PM Local time: Jun 3, 2006, 11:51 AM #7 of 14
Wow, really? I gotta try it out and see for myself then...

FELIPE NO
Arbok
Toho Mikado


Member 325

Level 9.20

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 08:13 PM #8 of 14
Originally Posted by LiveTendiser
I'd recommend Mp3DirectCut. Quick, easy, and directly cuts the mp3.
Awesome, thanks for the link! You are a life saver!

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?
quazi
I apologize for nothing!


Member 353

Level 15.08

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 08:51 PM #9 of 14
Quick question that's almost on topic: does encoding a file multiple times at the same bitrate with the same codec degrade it's quality each time?

Jam it back in, in the dark.


"Oh sirrah"
-Hedonism Bot
PUG1911
I expected someone like you. What did you expect?


Member 2001

Level 17.98

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 09:13 PM #10 of 14
Yes it does. It encodes the file to the best of it's ability, and therefore loses a little bit here and there. Just because it preserved something last time, doesn't mean that it won't drop it this time. It's unfortunate.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
quazi
I apologize for nothing!


Member 353

Level 15.08

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 3, 2006, 09:42 PM #11 of 14
Originally Posted by PUG1911
Yes it does. It encodes the file to the best of it's ability, and therefore loses a little bit here and there. Just because it preserved something last time, doesn't mean that it won't drop it this time. It's unfortunate.
Well it's my understanding that if you encoded two full quality identical songs, you should get the same encoded song because they use an algorithmic process. I didn't think it was random.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.


"Oh sirrah"
-Hedonism Bot
PUG1911
I expected someone like you. What did you expect?


Member 2001

Level 17.98

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2006, 01:08 AM #12 of 14
That's true, if you use the same source it'll be the same each time. The source is not the same with a re-endoding process.

I assumed you meant encoding a song, then re-encoding the song with the same codec. This loses information because the source is no longer as whole as the original was. It then compresses this already compressed file again, and loses a bit more quality. Each time the file is re-encoded you'll lose something.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?
"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."
quazi
I apologize for nothing!


Member 353

Level 15.08

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2006, 07:06 AM #13 of 14
Originally Posted by PUG1911
That's true, if you use the same source it'll be the same each time. The source is not the same with a re-endoding process.

I assumed you meant encoding a song, then re-encoding the song with the same codec. This loses information because the source is no longer as whole as the original was. It then compresses this already compressed file again, and loses a bit more quality. Each time the file is re-encoded you'll lose something.
OK thanks, that was my question.

I was speaking idiomatically.


"Oh sirrah"
-Hedonism Bot
reflectiVe
R.I.P., J. Dilla. (Jay Dee)


Member 5717

Level 7.21

Apr 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2006, 06:17 PM Local time: Jun 5, 2006, 04:17 PM #14 of 14
I used "WavePad" to cut out things. Worked perfectly ever time I used it. I also use it to make custom ringtones...but that's just me. Anyway, I haven't used anything else but it's pretty easy to use.

Most amazing jew boots

This is message is dedicated to real Hip-hop
.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk > Shaving seconds off MP3s?

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.