|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
Missy Smith Reilly 2010
This was a journal entry, but I figured it'd get more discussion if I posted a thread.
Missy Smith Reilly is the Republican candidate for D.C. Congressperson. She ran unopposed in the primary, and stands absolutely zero chance of actually winning in an incredibly Democratic district. Since the people who have the least chance of winning often are the most outlandish, it shouldn't be too surprising that she did something weird. What shocked me was just how blatantly she went for scare tactics.
This is the least graphic of the two ads she's made. Embedded in her site on the left is the ad that nutty, Tritoch and I saw on TV last night. It was buffered on both ends by warnings. "The following political ad may contain content that will offend viewers; however, due to federal law, we are required to air this ad unedited." Firstly, I was surprised by this; I wasn't aware that that was on the books, but apparently:
So that means we're subjected to seeing pictures of [s]aborted[/s] miscarried (aborted babies DO NOT LOOK LIKE THAT) on TV during primetime. And no less, from a lady who, among other things: Spoiler:
Please give the largest gift you can to run the following ads on TV in Washington DC. EVERY PENNY you give will go toward these! This is YOUR CHANCE to have YOUR VOICE heard in OUR NATIONS CAPITAL for the BABIES who are being murdered across America. Go ahead; poke Obama, Pelosi, and Reid in the eye right here in their seat of power; they support the murder of babies, and we must expose their murderous agenda! I'm curious, though, and forgive my ignorance; does this mean a candidate could make a blatantly pornographic ad, show up at the end of it, and force stations to show it as is? Apparently the bit about stations not being liable results more from a lack of judicial comment on conflicting provisions more than a specific exemption from getting in trouble. Also, what does this pissing into the wind even do? She has no chance of winning the election. She's basically just throwing money away to scream about abortions. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Thread Tools | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[360] Halo Reach: Ghosts of GFF | SailorDaravon | Video Gaming | 1107 | Nov 10, 2011 06:33 AM |
[Multiplatform] Most anticipated game for 2010? | Kolba | Video Gaming | 52 | May 18, 2010 07:26 PM |