|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
I think I just pinned down what bothers me about it. The original had a distinct echo and faded effect, making the final product sound almost like the music had been put through a concert hall sound filter. This new one, while it does make the samples more sharp & distinct, and turns up the treble quite a bit, seems to have lost some of the overall presentation of the original. It seems less...theatric as a result.
In that way, I feel it's like the Valkyrie Profile re-release. It looks like they'll be giving the same kind of treatment to all of their re-releases. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Edit: I just loaded one of the songs (Wyvern) into Cool Edit and it has quite a few clipped sections. (Or sections that are close to clipping). That is bad mastering, folks! I guess they really tried to maximize the loudness of this one. The original Wyvern doesn't have any clipped sections. Some of them come very close, but the shape of the waveform is still preserved. Edit 2: On further inspection, there isn't any actual clipping in this song, but the overall loudness is greater than the original, and quite a few sections push it right to the limit. (As far as you can possibly go without getting a flat peak.). This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Oh wow, the difference in Wyvern is even more offensive than in Rosencrantz. Sure you have to turn it up a bit more to get the full effect, but it's definately a lot more atmospheric and conductive to the samples being used. If it were a live orchestral sound, I'd say tone it down, but given the nature of the medium I definately appreciate the large space it's presented in.
The next track, LeaMonde Town Center, has a ton of audible defects in the sound, and the bass isn't nearly as punchy when it comes in. The piano also benefits from the long reverb trails, giving it that otherworldly feel I loved about it. (On a side note I find this all a bit ironic, since the most prevailant comment on my senior recital's recorded pieces was "you use too much reverb" when this is clearly a case of when a large 'verby sound aids the sound rather than hinders it) How ya doing, buddy? |
Holy crap, this remastering is absolutely terrible!!!
Basically they ditched all the reverb and now all the synthesized instruments sound completely flat. Yikess and I was going to buy this... Damn! EDIT: OMG at Wyvern! :lol: What's this?? I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by Raijin; Jun 11, 2006 at 01:37 PM.
|
The original has two clipped samples in the whole song. For the remastered version, the clipping indicator was lighting up like a christmas tree. For those of you who haven't downloaded the new album yet, just listen to this "After and Before" clip. Terrible, ne? What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
FELIPE NO |
Good Chocobo |
I'm surprised at how utterly *bad* the synth sounds in the remastered version. I'm not saying it sounded great in the original but the reverb did a good job of masking it.
Most amazing jew boots |
I can't say it sounds bad to my ears, but would defintely buy the original version over the remastered if it was available. That said, it isn't, so...
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
This whole situation stinks. I wish I could get back the 30 bucks I spent ordering the reprint. The worse part is that I don't have the original to fall back on. I was never able to acquire a copy before it went out of print. I've tried a few times to get it secondhand and have failed. At this point I'll give anything for one. The Wyvern link isn't working for me, but if it's as butchered as everyone says, then maybe I'll have to take a hammer to my SQEX copy when it gets here... Urgh. I hate anticipating the arrival of something bad.
There's nowhere I can't reach.
~MV
|
I'm just dissapointed
This does the Original no justice Most amazing jew boots
Last edited by Argentis; Jun 12, 2006 at 09:15 AM.
|
Yup...another disappointed guy here!
Like I said earlier, I bought the reprint and I've just compared it to the original Digicube print and the sound sounds much more "muffled" to me then the "clear quality" Digicube version. Thank god...I at least have the Digicube one in lossless quality! (in case I'll never be able to find it for a reasonable price) How ya doing, buddy? |
I have just listened through the mp3s of my original digicube version.
Vagrant Story was the first VGM CD I bought - and this reprint is, well not aweful, but it lacks the flair if the original. I was okay with Valkyrie Profile's reprint, and I could tell there was a slight difference in the sound, and it was okay. I just hope that other reprints aren't the same I wonder what the final fantasy tactics reprint is like? Btw, thanks lassic for uploading it I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by Argentis; Jun 12, 2006 at 09:17 AM.
|
I'm downloading this anyway ~
The Vagrant Story OST is the ONLY VGM ost I've ever paid for, and I'm glad I own something so awesome. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
Call me tin-eared, but I simply can't hear much of a difference between the remastered and original tracks. It might just be my crappy speakers, or perhaps you have to be a genuine audiophile to percieve it.
In any case, the pirated copy of VS that I have will do for now FELIPE NO |
Tin-eared? Deaf is more like it! Although perhaps it could be your crappy speakers. The newer tracks have significantly less reverb and different loudness levels than the old ones, and the instruments have been equalized differently. Using my Shure IEMs, or even my Grados, I can hear the difference easily, and I'm certainly no audiophile. Hell, I don't even own an amplifier.
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
Wonderful Chocobo |
Oh goodness... This is horrible. So harsh and unrefined. I'm phenomenally glad I didn't buy the re-release to hear this remastered crap.
Well, I guess that answers my question very well. Thanks for the feedback and MP3s. Ehrm... Carry on, I guess. Most amazing jew boots |
I can hear the difference just in the Sanctum before and after tracks posted there, and I'm not sure I like the difference either.
Sendspace is not giving me any open slots, but from what you guys are saying, I think I'll quit trying. They obviously cut a lot of corners resampling this. This is why my enthusiasm was so checked, considering it wasn't Sakimoto rearranging this. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Sanctum: what's with those echo's in the remastered version??? They sound too long.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Syklis Green |
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
I burned a few of the tracks that people were complaining about to a CD and popped in the stereo, and the difference was a lot more apparent then. Definitely for the worse, too; the reverb was the score's saving grace. I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by orion_mk3; Jun 15, 2006 at 12:52 PM.
|