Critically Insane
Member 2968
Level 5.51
Mar 2006
|
Jan 27, 2009, 10:45 AM
Local time: Jan 27, 2009, 08:45 AM
|
#1 of 98
|
The Oscars aren't just about giving awards to the best movies of the year. That's what the Best Picture award is for. For the most part, the Oscars are about how much an individual (or individuals) gave. Obviously, there will always be many disagreements about who deserves to be nominated and/or win. Whatever. If you're upset, there are plenty ways to complain. That's what blogs are for.
Does Heath Ledger deserve to win? Sure. He deserves to win as much as the other nominees do. If he does, good for him. I enjoyed his performance. But if he wins, it's not just because of his acting and the impact it had on its viewers, it's because of the dedication. It's what he gave to the role. It's the same for all the other nominees. Of those nominated, may the best win.
I think his tragic death did have an impact on the viewer. I'm sure everyone in the audience at one time or another said, "Damn, this is it. This is what he gave. This is his last performance." Of course, it wasn't his last performance, but not many people know that. Whether it's the case or not for you, let's not ignore the fact that people do tend to commemorate someone and their work more than expected if that someone is dead. There are so many paintings out there that became famous because its artist passed away. The same can be said about music, literature, films, even performances.
2008 was a great year at the movies. I approve most of the nominees in their chosen categories. Of what I've seen, they did a spectacular job. My only gripe? I wish Jon Stewart was hosting again. I didn't get to see him last time. Oh well, Hugh Jackman is a stud. Go Wolvie!
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|