|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
Ok, here is the real resolution:
http://www.house.mo.gov/bills061/bil...o/HCR0013I.htm Basically, all it resolves is that "voluntary prayer in public schools and religious displays on public property are not a coalition of church and state, but rather the justified recognition of the positive role that Christianity has played in this great nation" That is it. Nothing more. There are statements that are premises for the resolution, but they are nt the resolution itself. How ya doing, buddy? |
Sorry Wesker, my link is better. It is more updated. 93rd general assembly versus 92nd general assembly. :P Your's is from 2003, wheras mine is from 2006.
Although, this IS rather interesting how those look significantly different. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Wesker and I posted links to 2 different versions of the actual resolution, mine being the most updated, and the one that is considering being passed. Double Post:
And no, this resolution doesn't really affect those who say they do not participate in any religious activities. If you want to see what the resolution says, look here: http://www.house.mo.gov/bills061/bil...o/HCR0013I.htm This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Last edited by Fjordor; Mar 4, 2006 at 02:55 PM.
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
I think that is what the resolution is saying. That, by allowing children to, of their own accord, pray, that is in no way a violation of the establishment clause.
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
I believe it is just a clarification resolution. Those happen all the time in all sorts of levels of government.
So, yes, it really shouldn't change anything; but it will do so nonetheless for those who want to read into the establishment clause things which aren't really there. Most amazing jew boots |
Like I said before, I believe this is a clarification resolution, seeing as how the vast majority of complaints about acts of prayer in schools are against Christians, not by them.
Essentially, all it does it silence a bunch of whiny pricks who might cry that permission implies endorsement, and thus violation of the establishment clause. Then again, maybe the wording of the state constitution is inadequte, and so they felt it necessary to include this. I dunno, I am just speculating on reasons that might not lead one to think "ZOMG!!!1! CHRISTIAN IMPERIALISM!" What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
Last edited by Fjordor; Mar 6, 2006 at 03:31 AM.
|
I must say that your first post in this thread appears to be bordering on the low-end of PP quality standards. (to Sing)
FELIPE NO |
Thread Tools | |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video Games Live | Tommy Tallarico | General Game Music Discussion | 523 | May 26, 2011 11:33 PM |
The Happening | Thalin | Media Centre | 81 | Jun 25, 2008 12:31 AM |