[Wii] Smash Bros. Brawl

Why does he have a cape that turns into wings? Why does he have arms and hands?

My theory is he has copy abilities as well. Something weird he ate must have given him those and he never got rid of them.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Maybe they're cybernetic.

"It's over, Meta Knight! I have the high ground!"

::Kirby chops off limbs::

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!"

I was speaking idiomatically.

Originally Posted by AcerBandit

Why does he have a cape that turns into wings? Why does he have arms and hands?

How's this for a theory?... he's a dark knight.

Originally Posted by Free.User

Answer: The other samus will be included, but only if you buy the special edition game. The line up of the previous characters will be the same save the following: Bowser has been scrapped, DK is now Diddy Kong, Goomba is now a playable character, and 128 more Pokemon have been added. These are all facts. I know because I made the game. I repeat, this is factual information.

You're kidding. Who makes unbelievably stupid decisions like that? "HURR I THINK I'LL MAKE A MINOR ENEMY CHARACTER PLAYABLE. GOOMBA IS IN! AND ALSO I THINK I'LL SCRAP THE MASCOT FOR A FRANCHISE AND ONLY PUT HIS SIDEKICK IN INSTEAD. AND NOW YOU CAN PLAY AS 128 POKEMON, AS IN, YOU PLAY AS ALL OF THEM ALL AT ONCE. IN FACT I THINK I'LL MAKE ASININE SUCH AS THIS CONCEPTS PLAYABLE CHARACTERS. YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE IS PLAYABLE? LOVE. AND NO TOMATOES. NO TOMATOES IS ALSO PLAYABLE."

I'm aware that this is a joke but I still find it infuriating.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

New topic: A friend just showed me this.

Thoughts? I'm personally struggling to see the resemblance between the symbol on the flag and the symbol on the badge...

FELIPE NO

Your friend's wrong, sorry, there's just no resemblance between the flag and the symbol on the FE map.

And besides, there are better character choices if you're going from Fire Emblem: Path of Raidiance. Try the Black Knight, or heck maybe Ike (despite his similarities to Marth and Roy) or Titania.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Originally Posted by PsychoJosh

You're kidding. Who makes unbelievably stupid decisions like that? "HURR I THINK I'LL MAKE A MINOR ENEMY CHARACTER PLAYABLE. GOOMBA IS IN! AND ALSO I THINK I'LL SCRAP THE MASCOT FOR A FRANCHISE AND ONLY PUT HIS SIDEKICK IN INSTEAD. AND NOW YOU CAN PLAY AS 128 POKEMON, AS IN, YOU PLAY AS ALL OF THEM ALL AT ONCE. IN FACT I THINK I'LL MAKE ASININE SUCH AS THIS CONCEPTS PLAYABLE CHARACTERS. YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE IS PLAYABLE? LOVE. AND NO TOMATOES. NO TOMATOES IS ALSO PLAYABLE."

I'm aware that this is a joke but I still find it infuriating.

K
...

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Free.User

K
...

That's why he posted then he editted his post.. I thought it was a little fishy but I wanna take the time to research the info..

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Furby

That's why he posted then he editted his post.. I thought it was a little fishy but I wanna take the time to research the info..

What are you talking about?

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

The guy said that he knew all along that you were just joking but as you can see, he editted his post a few minutes later after realizing that he just made a fool of himself.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Ooh, I see. But he still finds it infuriating...

I was speaking idiomatically.

Originally Posted by Krelian

New topic: A friend just showed me this.

Thoughts? I'm personally struggling to see the resemblance between the symbol on the flag and the symbol on the badge...

What game is that from??? I mean, the character.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

I did a Google Search and was pointed to Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance.

How ya doing, buddy?

Mmmm.. Forwhoever said that it could be that one guy is in it... maybe teh stage is for Roy and Marth(sp)?

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

That doesn't explain why the Daien flag is there. Marth and Roy can't share a stage unless it's extremely ambiguous since they don't share the same universe. It has to be someone from one game in particular.

This guy probably thinks it's Ashnard in specific and not someone else from Path of Radiance because we never visit Daien. After Crimea is defeated, Ashnard quickly takes up residence in its capital. Still, why he would be in it before Ike or the hero(ine) of Fire Emblem X is beyond me.

EDIT: Ah, you know what? The hub-bub right now is that Fire Emblem X is looking like a direct sequel to Path of Radiance. The game is more than likely to take us to Daien, meaning almost anyone from the game could be in it.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

NO offense but Stages don't have to make sense... As it is, the game doesn't really makes sense to begin with..

There's nowhere I can't reach.

FIGHT ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTERS

YES

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Generic Badass

FIGHT ON THE WORLD TRADE CENTERS

YES

With random planes periodically smashing into the face of the level.

GOTTA AVIOD THE FALLING SUICIDEES!

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

I can see an enemy castle from Fire Emblem being a stage, while having a good guy (Ike, probably, and Marth and Roy if they keep them) being a playable character.
I mean, it's not like you're going to fight in a good guy castle. That doesn't happen all that often in Fire Emblem.

How ya doing, buddy?

I don't think they should add anymore Fire Emblem characters, I think they should try to have a variety of characters from differant games. There are already alot of Mario characters, and far too many pokemon, I just want there to be a fair amount of characters from games not used before.

ps: My favorite character to play in melee was sandbag *Jump* *Stand* *Jump*

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Meh, I think Nintendo is doing fine with the existing list, maybe add a few more, but those that are already in there should stay. I think Nintendo was trying to limit to trademark characters in many series, which would explain the massive amounts of some of the charactes from some series. If you look at it, most characters come from Mario because they are trademark characters. (Mario, Luigi, Peach, Yoshi, Bowser). Granted, Dr. Mario is a stretch. As far as pokemon go, that should be find as well, Mewtwo, Pikachu, and Jigglypuff are trademark characters (at least in Japan). Pichu is, again, a stretch. Earthbound basically features Ness as the main character. Paula and Poo are justifiable, but not any other characters, as trademark characters. Pit joins us from Kid Icarus, Kirby draws in Metaknight for a strong dose of trademark characters from that series, Marth and Roy are both trademark characeters of Fire Emblem. Two characters should be the maximum for each series, I think, because anymore and it seems to be overrepresented. But what's done is done, what's already there should not be removed in the next game. But granted, adding more Mario Characters or Pokemon is overkill.

FELIPE NO

If that's the case, then not much can be done to change up the formula. All we'll see is prettier graphics, more items, different stages, a few more characters, better music, and most likely the same moves, with some added spice to the mix.

Wait, what am I talking about, that's a good improvement.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

The difference between adding multiple Mario characters is that Mario, Peach, Bowser, and Yoshi all play differently. The difference between Marth and Roy is almost neglegible. The presence of a character should be determined by "Would it be cool to play as this character" and "Would they offer a different gameplay experience from character X" not "We already have a Pokemon so lets add more fire emblem characters". Personally, I thought Ganondorf, Young Link, Roy, Dr. Mario, Falco, etc. Were totally useless as there were other characters who were almost the same.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by SOLDIER

Aren't you supposed to type up a reason why you'd want x character in though? Hopefully not, as I'd like to submit a character or two in the japanese site. It still isn't known if they'll make an english version of the site.

I'm still thinking what song I would like to vote on. Maybe an orchestral version of the Super Mario 2 theme (last game only had the original version).

It doesn't say you have to explain why you want a character in there. A character's name should be good enough. Wouldn't be a bad idea to include the game their from though. I like the idea that we'll get the chance to tip the scales a bit for a change. They really should have opened up an American site though, if they ever do I'll vote there too.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Generic Badass

This guy probably thinks it's Ashnard in specific and not someone else from Path of Radiance because we never visit Daien. After Crimea is defeated, Ashnard quickly takes up residence in its capital. Still, why he would be in it before Ike or the hero(ine) of Fire Emblem X is beyond me.

So have you played Path of Raidiance? You spend a good quarter of the game in Daien.

Like i said before, Ashnard would be cool, but it would make sense to add a hero character from Path of Raidience. I think maybe they should ditch Marth and or Roy and just replace one or both of them with Ike, he's the same character, so all that would change is a character design and a name.

But if we're talking bad guys from PoR then i'd say add the Black Knight. He would be the coolest thing ever to play as.

Spoiler:

yes i realize that in the game he's invicible, but whatever, this is smash bros.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but I'd like to see Zora, Goron and Deku Scrub. I originally was thinking of a character similiar to Sheik/Zelda (Able to change between the three in the midst of battle), but now I think they should be their own character. They each have enough distinct ablilities to be indepentant. Also, the argument of "trademark characters" is moot. Characters aren't chosen by popularity, they are chosen by uniquenss. (I realize there were some clones in SSBM....)

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?