|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
I wouldn't bet my life on your claim. The bible, too, calls for the massacre of infidels. Had the pope of the time have it, he would have gladly use it and say, ''I have cleared the Earth from infidels''
This is why controlling iran (and surrounding countries) is important. THEY don't have the rule of law, they have the sharia (law from the kuran). And because such a law also calls for the extinction of infidels, we must be very careful. Of course, imposing democracy like it is done in iraq is no solution. Prosperity brings democracy, not the other way around I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Sharia is law. While Sharia may be objectionable to Western values it is a code of law, and countries like Iran and even areas of Somalia that were controlled by the Islamic Courts Union had rule of law.
I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by Bradylama; Jul 22, 2008 at 12:13 PM.
|
You're dumb. Let's say I steal your car. What do you want? Obviously, you want the car back. You're going to resent me, yes. You may want to kill me, and let's suppose further that you have a deadly bomb that will kill me without fail. Job One is getting back the fucking car, however. You can't blow me up when I'm in the car, because that would BLOW UP THE CAR. And that's the goal: TO GET THE CAR BACK. You're dumb. People aren't cartoons. They have GOALS which usually override their immediate prejudices. The Crusades had a significant undercurrent of bigotry, yes, but they were primarily about real estate. You're dumb. Now go read a book and don't open your mouth again until you have. You're dumb. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
FELIPE NO John Mayer just asked me, personally, through an assistant, to sing backup on his new CD. |
Most amazing jew boots |
Oh, sure. Malaysia has Sharia law but you don't see women getting stoned or thieves getting their hands cut off. It's worth noting that that most populous Muslim nation in the world (Indonesia) doesn't even enforce Sharia law.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
To you, Sharia law might seem barbaric but to them, our and America's laws probably seem incredibly soft and no deterrent to criminals (Which by and large they no longer are). Just because something is different to your experiences doesn't mean it's automatically bad or wrong and you shouldn't look at stuff in such black and white terms. You're basically an un-educated bigot and each post you make, makes you look more of an idiot. If I were you, I'd quit while I still had a choice. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Regressing Since 1988 |
Just thought I'd, you know, clear that up. Go on back to fighting a losing battle now. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
I mean this in the kindest way: stop to examine things. Don't be so gullible. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
However, like other religions (including christianity), a big part of it is based on primitive beliefs that, among others, women are inferior. Just look at the recent move of the anglican church: there could be a schism because women are now allowed in higher positions. Even the pope perpetuated the mysogynist tradition of the church by saying that this was against the apostolic tradition I was speaking idiomatically. |
Misogyny isn't exactly exclusive to religion...
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
Arguably the belief that bitches ain't shit seems a lot more reasonable when the Lord Of Creation has your back, though
FELIPE NO |
The best part of this is watching Janus backpedal as fast as possible when he realises how obscenely outclassed he is.
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? John Mayer just asked me, personally, through an assistant, to sing backup on his new CD. |
Most amazing jew boots |
rock n roll jesus christ There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Tch, that's the Jews, not the Christians. You should know that Jesus died so we wouldn't have to care about Deuteronomy and all that jazz (see: Old Testament).
Besides, it doesn't say infidels. Say... has the Catholic Church ever even used that term? I never even thought of that, before. I can't recall any specific time a Christian has used it. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
I'm sure "heretic" has been used quite often in Catholic times.
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19 Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven. You're dumb. I was speaking idiomatically. |
Gal 2:15 - Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. Thus, the old school way of doing business that Sass pointed out in Deuteronomy doesn't really apply. Otherwise, we'd still be doing animal sacrifice and stuff. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
How ya doing, buddy? |
Please, all I have to do to shoot holes in that argument is put it in context.
And — even if he were, you'd be putting a quote attributed to Paul up against a quote attributed to Christ and saying it's more important, which NO. As for "animal sacrifice", I don't really see how "sport hunting" is anything else but that. "I killed that deer!" "Are you gonna eat it?" "Naw." What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?
Last edited by The unmovable stubborn; Jul 24, 2008 at 02:57 PM.
|
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
If fulfilling something ends it, and abolishing something ends it, in what sense is it possible to fulfill the law but not abolish it? You've made Jesus into either a liar or self-contradictory.
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
I'm not really sure how this isn't clear. Say there's a law that says "If you do X, you will pay consequence Y". Well, we could either abolish the law - that is to say, we make it null and void in that we decide there is no longer any need for consequence Y. But if that were that case, what justified the law in the first place?
Or we can fulfill the law by taking consquence Y. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Ok, say I steal a TV, and I go to jail for it. I've now fulfilled the law that stealing TVs will make me go to jail. Yes. But: the next guy who steals a TV will also go to jail, and so on., indefinitely.
Your position is that since I went to jail (fulfilling the anti-theft law), it's now a burglary-free-for-all with no consequences for everyone else. Except it's not, since he did not abolish the law. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |