|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. FGSFDS!!! |
Then again, for awhile, any accomplishments that women made probably weren't recorded at all, so they're likely not to be reflected in today's textbooks. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
I was speaking idiomatically. FGSFDS!!! |
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
FELIPE NO |
Still want you to tell me what you know about African history and culture. Go ahead and be as lengthy as you want. Doublespace if it makes you feel better. Most amazing jew boots |
But also, by raw numbers, men have done a lot more in American History. That's not to deny the importance of women in American History, that's just simple fact. Men were just in better positions to do so because of the low position of women at that time in history. Jam it back in, in the dark. FGSFDS!!! |
And plenty of accomplishments that women did were recorded, most just don't know about it because they keep reading white man books. Just like there have been many different accomplishment by different races. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Tell me about Africa, please. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
West African culture? Sure, plays a major part in a lot of American culture. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? FGSFDS!!! |
I was speaking idiomatically. |
Ok, let's assume that men have done more in the past. But you said yourself that women were important in American history yet are hardly ever mentioned in the textbooks. Are their efforts somehow less important than the ones by their male counterparts? American history textbooks go up well into the later 20th century, which women have already begun to take a larger part in history yet their mentions in the text are still ridiculously low. It's because of the chauvinistic caucasian perspective of history that modern textbooks display that is the reason behind it. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
What's important is what helped this nation arise to the point where it is today. And I'm sorry, but black culture is not as major of a part of that as what you want to think it is. Where our nation started was with a disagreement with england over religous rights. Pilgrims came here, founded a colony, eventually got pissed off at england, won our independance. In short. Obviously there's a shitload more in between there, but I'm going to assume you hopefully know all that and that I don't need to repeat 100 years of history.
I know African history as it pertains to America. I don't give a shit about how Kenya arose, it has nothing to do with America. FELIPE NO FGSFDS!!! |
Please, explain to me why the hell I need to spend a week learning about AFRICAN history in an AMERICAN history class. West African culture is an entirely different story. It is something that EXISTED IN AMERICA. Something with a DIRECT effect on American culture. Learn the difference between the two.
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? FGSFDS!!! |
How ya doing, buddy? |
Get a dictionary. Look up racist. Look up sexist. Racism and Sexism are actively discriminating against people simply because of their race and sex, respectively. Realizing that men and europeans proportionately have a larger role in our history, and wanting our history classes as a result to spend an equally proportionate time learning about this isn't sexist or racist. There's nowhere I can't reach. FGSFDS!!! |
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Most amazing jew boots FGSFDS!!! |
Do you honestly think that a whole new landmass ripe for the taking wouldn't attract other kinds of visitors, just a cult of people who hate sex and niggers? I mean christ.
Okay, honestly, listen to me here: America was a colonized continent, right? And so was Africa during the same time frame. DO YOU THINK THERE MIGHT BE POSSIBLY SOME RELEVANT PARALELLS BETWEEN TWO COLONIZED AND OPPRESSED CONTINENTS DURING THE SAME ERA OF TIME POSSIBLY? No, you don't, because you're stupid and you're racist. Go buy a Dodge Ram. Double Post:
I was speaking idiomatically.
Last edited by Sarag; Jun 19, 2006 at 11:53 PM.
Reason: Automerged additional post.
|
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
FELIPE NO |
What became political America started with that colony, which is why it is given focus. The disagreements with those Puritans and England basically just grew until the Revolutionary war erupted.
Fuck this. I'm not here to give you a history lesson. What do you want me to say, that they are all a bunch of fucking niggers with huge lower lips that like spicy cajun food and fried chicken? Would that satisfy you? Would that make you more secure, to think that I'm a racist? Whatever makes you happy. What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? FGSFDS!!! |
And yet you have these huge chapters on bad meat practices when I'd argue that women's rights would be a much more important topic for the ~50% of students that are girls that are reading it.
The fact that you stubbornly insist that men and europeans have a larger role in history shows your innate ignorance on history as truth. You are lead to believe that history, or the history that is important anyways, is largely male and caucasian and you don't question it. History is ALWAYS about questioning what is given to us, do you really believe those textbooks you read are the absolute truth? Because history is not just one story from a couple very exclusive people, first hand sources, second hand, an unbiased view (because what we are reading IS biased), I'm sure you'd get a much broader and larger ranged and eventually, a history that is much closer to the real fact. But for girls reading the textbooks, they are lead to believe that women aren't important because they haven't been in history. That's the real underlying issue, the sort of subtle inferiority you are giving the minorities and women because they don't see their own portrayed in what they are reading, in the history they are given. But it's so far from the truth because minorites and women HAVE been important but they just aren't accurately portrayed. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
If you are learning about American history, in a standard 1 year high school course, all you really need to know about West Africa is that that is primarily where we got our slave labor from. If we are talking about a college course for a history major, maybe a little more knowledge would be called for. I was under the impression we were just talking about basic American history. There's nowhere I can't reach. FGSFDS!!! |
How ya doing, buddy? |