|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer | |||
Star Trek | 24 | 25.26% | |
Star Wars | 46 | 48.42% | |
Both | 11 | 11.58% | |
Neither | 14 | 14.74% | |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
Member 192 Level 10.26 Mar 2006 |
Star Trek VS Star Wars
It's that age old topic again (or is it the first time on here?) anyway which do you prefer and why, what makes them so good or bad? or why you don’t care. so let's make some conversation
Most amazing jew boots |
Member 635 Level 32.46 Mar 2006 |
I feel that Star Trek does a better job of expressing the characters' past and emotions. Also, given that Star Wars has "The Force," Star Trek feels a bit more believeable.
How ya doing, buddy? |
Member 192 Level 10.26 Mar 2006 |
Thats a good point but most people I know seem to think we are closer to Star wars then Star Trek. I dont see how though. Personally I'm a Trekki so I'm a little one sided here, I didnt really enjoy the Star wars movies but at the same time they werent bad. I'd rather watch William Shatner.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Member 1641 Level 10.58 Mar 2006 |
GarretTheThief, you have missed Stargate. That's the serie of my choice .
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Member 635 Level 32.46 Mar 2006 |
It isn't that the Star Wars movies are bad. Both Star Trek and Star Wars are quite enjoyable. With Star Wars is was more of a classic good against evil. My problem with it, though, is that we knew the heroes would eventually win. With Star Trek, it was more of a "What's happening in the universe?" It's really a matter of preference.
I was speaking idiomatically. |
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? oh my gawddd |
Member 192 Level 10.26 Mar 2006 |
FELIPE NO |
Member 635 Level 32.46 Mar 2006 |
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
Well, i don't particularly like either of them that much, but i think over all Star Wars is alot more interesting. Star Trek seems to get a bit old and samey. I haven't seen it in years so i can't really comment that much but yeah. Star Wars stories are more gripping to me
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Member 70 Level 26.54 Mar 2006 |
I love Star Trek simply because the spin offs such as Generation, and Deep Space Nine were so good. Also I liked alot of the characters plus the intergalatic politics between the races.
I really like SG-1, especially the earlier series,(I liked the original film too), but I don't care much for the spin off. There's nowhere I can't reach.
Last edited by El Ray Fernando; Mar 25, 2006 at 12:43 PM.
|
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Also: You die when you fall on flowers I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Midichlorians!
I was speaking idiomatically. Nothing wrong with not being strong
Nothing says we need to beat what's wrong Nothing manmade remains made long That's a debt we can't back out of |
Star Trek and Star Wars are both pretty good. But they are not really the same: Star Wars would be best classified as an action type movie, not scifi, since there is not really any "sci" to it. Star Trek seems more real, and more thought is put into how their devices actually work and everything.
Both Stargates seem kinda cheesy to me, then again so are Wars and Trek. Just doesn't get me though. What you really want is Battlestar Galactica (the new one). There's a good show. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
A koopa never lived who had an ounce of integrity.
|
Saying Star Wars isn't sci-fi is a retarded statement at best. "Next Generation isn't sci-fi because they had episodes with Robin Hood, Sherlock Holmes, Mark Twain! It must be a historical drama!"
FELIPE NO |
I agree with you Ottonabs. THis poll is kind of like saying "Do you like 'Wonderous Sci Fi Show' or 'Huge Action Show' better?" How ya doing, buddy? |
I hate Star Trek. I've tried to watch a few episodes, but I just can't do it. I have to change the channel. Star Wars on the other hand, is much more interesting to me and I've enjoyed all of the movies. (The Empire Strikes Back being the best of them.)
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
How ya doing, buddy?
Tuco: God is on our side, he hates the Yankees.
Man With No Name: God is not on our side because he also hates idiots. |
I don't even want to participate in this poll.
Why do people even compare these totally unrelated science fiction (I am of the opinion that Star Wars is more so fantasy than it is sci fi) franchises? One is a TV show, one is a series of movies. There's really nothing similar between them except SPACE. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Darth Vader! VERSUS Numbah One! Going by this relevant and totally fair costume comparison, I would have to say I prefer Star Wars. I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Both have their good points, but Star Trek is far more "realistic" (in a loose sense of the term...). I mean, there are things in ST that could be made at some point in the not-too-distant future and are useful, like the transporter, replicator, universal translator or the medical tricorder. And ST has inspired people to create things as well -- in that sense it's realistic.
Star Wars is a huge amalgam of every archetypal mythic character, which is my theory as to why so many people instantly fall in love with the series. I love it, but it's so fantastical and over the top that it doesn't seem quite as down-to-earth as ST. Even though it deals with human emotions and problems, it's not as personal and detailed as the human experiences that the characters in ST have; this might be due to the fact that ST is a TV series, so they have a lot of episodes in which to explore each character, whereas SW only has six movies (and legions of books, but not everyone reads those...). I like them both, in their own ways. But Star Trek has been a favorite of mine since I was quite young, so I'll have to go with it. I was speaking idiomatically. |
Member 3974 Level 10.97 Mar 2006 |
Star Wars - Without Jar Jar Binks and the Ewoks!
I never watched Star Trek, not because I don't like it, but because in my country ST is not known very much.
Star Wars on the other hand is very well known. I watched the movies for the first time in 2005, before Episode III premiered. I had never liked Star Wars before *watching* the movies... after that, I found myself on the cinema on May 19 to see Episode III. And I always though going the opening day was a geek thing... you know, those dressed like Stormtroopers. And there *were* some that day! Just not as many as seen on the United States. Anyway, SW is my preference. I'd watch Star Trek to *know* it at least... How many ST movies are there? What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
Star Wars is fantasy in space. Star Trek is a fictional account of humanity's future. Enjoy both of them and stop wasting time debating whether one is the best.
FELIPE NO |
Most amazing jew boots |
Maybe we can roll up this "discussion" again when the Star Wars TV show thingy airs.
Star Wars has the Spinoff Trilogy and Star Trek has Voyager, so both suck at some parts. Babylon 5 wins. Yay for Lando. *crowd goes wild* How ya doing, buddy? |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General Discussion] Don't Buy the Hype | Bradylama | Video Gaming | 11 | Feb 15, 2007 11:48 PM |
Shining Force EXA | Gechmir | Video Gaming | 20 | Aug 4, 2006 07:27 PM |