HAY GUYS

Why Am I Allowed to Have Gray Paint · Local time: Jul 15, 2006, 02:37 AM

There's also still a bug where if you go into Edit Options and then save whatever change you make, your country flag defaults to USA, if you had it set to "none" previously.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Little Shithead · Jul 14, 2006, 09:44 PM

Originally Posted by Ultima

Need an optional white theme. I've been saying this for months. Listen to me.

I don't like white themes, and I'm sure a lot of other people don't.

The only way I can summarize any of my thoughts on a white theme all wind up as "They're pretty fucking gay."

They also blind.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

**THE POWER OF WATER** · Local time: Jul 14, 2006, 07:44 PM

Originally Posted by Free.User

Why don't you create a thread/poll in which 56k members (well, I suppose all members) can vote if they are/aren't in favour of a size increase? If the majority (>90%) is in favour, I see no reason not to increase it.

90% is significantly more than a majority.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Soluzar · Local time: Jul 15, 2006, 04:39 AM

Originally Posted by Merv Burger

I don't like white themes, and I'm sure a lot of other people don't.

Can't stand 'em myself, but as long as it's optional, and the blue-on-blue that I'm used to doesn't go any place, what's the big deal?

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Inhert · Jul 15, 2006, 01:15 AM

the only thing that I don't like about having new theme is that it will make all my sig very ugly on those theme...

because I use blue background to "fake" transparency so I can save them in jpeg and don't exceed the kb limit ...

FELIPE NO

Free.User · Local time: Jul 14, 2006, 10:35 PM

Originally Posted by CHz

90% is significantly more than a majority.

Yes, but I think that if more than 10% of GFF is against raising the minimum, then it's fair to leave it.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

value tart · 07:19 PM

Apparently a feature has been added that makes closed threads turn gray. I don't know how I feel about this one yet, on the one hand it makes closed threads less prominent, on the other hand if I'm looking for a thread that may have recently got closed the gray would make it harder for me to find it.

Also, I just noticed: it applies to stickies also, making those less prominent, even with that big IMPORTANT: sticker there. Wouldn't it make sense to not have that affect stickies? >_>

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Free.User · Local time: Jul 15, 2006, 04:21 PM

Originally Posted by Mo0

Apparently a feature has been added that makes closed threads turn gray. I don't know how I feel about this one yet, on the one hand it makes closed threads less prominent, on the other hand if I'm looking for a thread that may have recently got closed the gray would make it harder for me to find it.

Also, I just noticed: it applies to stickies also, making those less prominent, even with that big IMPORTANT: sticker there. Wouldn't it make sense to not have that affect stickies? >_>

I just read that whole thing, mistaking gray as gay.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

value tart · Jul 15, 2006, 07:35 PM

THE GAY WOULD MAKE IT HARDER FOR ME TO FIND IT!

No seriously, aren't closed threads (with a few exceptions) already gay to begin with?

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Infernal Monkey · Local time: Jul 16, 2006, 01:48 PM

Pretty much!

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

***Jurassic Park Chocolate Raptor*** · Local time: Jul 19, 2006, 01:57 AM

Originally Posted by Free.User

Yes, but I think that if more than 10% of GFF is against raising the minimum, then it's fair to leave it.

4 days late, but this had to be said anyway.

According to google analytics, 11.1 percent of GFF uses dial-up.

So if 10 percent of those people, a whopping 1.11 percent of the userbase, say they can't stand loading signatures bigger than 50 KB, then it's fair to leave it at the size it's currently at?

Ok.

Even if you include all members voting, 90% is way off base for a majority vote. Since when do 10% of people decide what's best for everyone else? =\

I was speaking idiomatically.

Free.User · Local time: Jul 19, 2006, 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by Colonel Skills

According to google analytics, 11.1 percent of GFF uses dial-up.

So if 10 percent of those people, a whopping 1.11 percent of the userbase, say they can't stand loading signatures bigger than 50 KB, then it's fair to leave it at the size it's currently at?

I said 90% (or 10%, however you want to look at it) of GFF, not 90% of dialup users.

Originally Posted by Colonel Skills

Even if you include all members voting, 90% is way off base for a majority vote. Since when do 10% of people decide what's best for everyone else? =\

I was trying to be fair to dailup users (having been one before), but I suppose 90% is a bit much.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?