Britney Spears loses custody of chidren

Originally Posted by Avalokiteshvara

This sentence just strikes me as ridiculous. I'm just thinking about the logic. If you don't wear underwear, you are not fit to raise children. The contrapositive is that you are fit to raise children if you wear underwear.

I think there's a slight difference between freeballing and showing off your goods to every tabloid photographer that happens to catch you spreading your legs while stepping out of a car. Perhaps just "not wearing underwear" isn't so bad as much as not wearing it for the sheer attention of a cheap money shot.

In any case I didn't mean to say that not wearing underwear in and of itself made her unfit; it's more the fact that she can't EVEN do that much given her already checkered reputation. It speaks more to 'insult to injury' rather than 'smoking gun,' so to speak.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

They need to get Michael Jackson involved in this somehow.

WHAT A TWEEEST!

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

I'm honestly surprised they didn't take those kids away earlier. Especially around the umbrella/bald head stage.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

I was at work and someone yelled "Britney lost custody of her kids...now she's going to kill herself."
lol, but yeah. Who didn't see this cumming. But, who knows, she might get them back, knowing how celebrities get treated.

I was speaking idiomatically.