Myspace Threat... (lol)

Its great to know that the secret service is taking time out of their schedule to look at myspace! Don't mind the fact there are more important things but why not go check myspace pictures. 50 year old men (not for sure) are looking at profiles of 14 year old girls, hmm...that seems good.

Hey...while they're at it, why don't they take google into questioning for all of their anti-bush, kill bush type things. Oh! maybe internet photograph sites, maybe even flash cartoons.

Yeah...bravo secret service...you have continued to destroy my faith in america.

IMO Bush is a horrible president and should be taken out of office if not, cheney should take Bush hunting. I hate the man because he has wasted countless resources for a cause we shouldn't even be involved in.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by JammerLea

I think he means loudly saying something like, "A BOMB?!" while on a phone in a crowded area for the purpose of creating panic as a joke.

Big no no.

There was this whole thing a few years back that by saying certain key words on mobile phones would trigger a recording device at the exchange to record the rest of your conversation, to see if you were a terrorist. It was never proven and nothing ever came of it. It just kind of sank back into the media desert.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Capo

No, I can't kick your ass for calling me a name. That would be assault. The protections of the President violate the First Amendment, and there's no way around that fact.

There are specific limitations to the freedom of speech. The classic example that you will learn in your government/civics class is that you are not free to yell "Fire" in a crowded movie theater. While this is a clear abridgement of the freedom of speech, it's a case where there is a compelling reason for society to curtail that natural right for the common good.

The 1st ammendment does not protect:

- Libel & Slander

- Calling in a bomb threat to a school

- Threatening assault or bodily harm

- Lying under oath

- Sexual discussion with a minor

What the 1st ammendment does protect, and protect well, is political speech.

Anyway, the Secret Service's job is to protect the President from nuts, and there are plenty of them out there. Remember that the last assassination attempt was by a mentally ill man who wanted to impress Jodi Foster. Who would have thought that credible. Anyway, they interviewed her for an hour, and deemed her a non-threat, so they did their job.

I remember there was an old guy at my church back when I was in high-school. When he was younger, he got a Secret Service visit because he wrote a threatening letter to president Eisenhower. They investigated, and determined he was a harmless crackpot, which he was.

As for whether the parents should have been present, I'm not sure what the law says on these issues. I do know that if we are going be concerned about this young, sweet, vibrant young lady being interviewed alone, then we need to apply the same concern to the young black adolescent in the city who's being questioned by authorities about a shooting.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by fiercedeity

There was this whole thing a few years back that by saying certain key words on mobile phones would trigger a recording device at the exchange to record the rest of your conversation, to see if you were a terrorist. It was never proven and nothing ever came of it. It just kind of sank back into the media desert.

Ohhh... I hadn't heard that one. Kinda surprised that I didn't, with one of the teachers I had in college. Big anti-Bush kinda guy, always discussing political stuff in class. I love that teacher, but I finally started bringing my headphones and music to class to drown him out.

How ya doing, buddy?

After the 9/11 attacks a guy in MY SCHOOL in AUSTRALIA who's name was Osama registered osamabinladen@hotmail.com and the CIA contacted him as if he was a huge threat to US national sercurity.

Quote:

The 1st ammendment does not protect:
- Sexual discussion with a minor

=0
How do sex ed classes in school work then?

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?