|
|
Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
|
Thread Tools |
There's nowhere I can't reach. |
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? John Mayer just asked me, personally, through an assistant, to sing backup on his new CD. |
Very exciting! I've heard something along the lines that Sam Raimi is being considered for a directorial role... we'll just have to wait and see.
It's good that Peter Jackson and Weta studio will reprise their roles in various areas of production. That should keep a sense of continuity from LOTR to the HOBBIT.
What I am saying is that it will probably pay off to hire an entirely different younger, more physical actor for the role of Bilbo. After all, the Hobbit script has plenty of actio, which will likely call for a more youthful and athletic approach to the role. I believe Bilbo was nearly 50 years old at the time that Hobbit begins. I was speaking idiomatically.
...
Last edited by RainMan; Dec 20, 2007 at 07:48 PM.
|
I think his point is that Jackson doesn't derail a Hobbit film in terms of creative output is he is not involved. Because, he really isn't the end all, be all of directors. However, I do think the film will be derailed if Jackson doesn't direct as I think McKellen and some others didn't want to be a part of it if he didn't. So, pragmatically speaking, the film will suck if Jackson isn't there, because I don't think anyone would be willing to accept a Gandalf that isn't McKellen, but philosophically-- I don't really think Jackson is a requirement. There's plenty of good directors out there. That said, I do think Jackson gets too much credit for Lord of the Rings. Yeah, he worked hard and certainly went beyond the requirements of merely point a camera and staging the actors, but it doesn't mean he doesn't output shit, which is I think Deni's chief point. Not gonna lie, King Kong? Kinda thought it sucked. And wasn't his involvement similar? And now with that said, Lord of the Rings is brilliant. I don't think someone can walk away from it and go: "Well, I didn't like it because of [blank]." Most amazing jew boots "You buy cheese from Europe by mail, is that correct?"
Last edited by XanaduTheory; Dec 29, 2007 at 07:54 PM.
|
Yeah King Kong was a horrendous movie. I didn't watch it to the end.
I don't think Bilbo is going to have a success like the LOTR trilogy did since it is intended to be more like a child's book instead of an epic tale. Since he,s not directing the movie, it might be good if they choose someone that is familiar with the story and mythology of JRR Tolkien. FELIPE NO
Not six....more like half a dozen...
|
But as I recall, the Ents came to the humans' aide. Or if not the Ents then the forest sprouted up in the battlefield or something to that effect. Either way, I remember the humans were bailed out of the fight somehow. What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
Jam it back in, in the dark. John Mayer just asked me, personally, through an assistant, to sing backup on his new CD. |