HAY GUYS

Little Shithead · May 30, 2006, 11:11 AM

Originally Posted by Tube

A lot of people care about the signature checker, myself included. It is highly retarded.

Quote for truth.

And for good measure:

Originally Posted by Tube

A lot of people care about the signature checker, myself included. It is highly retarded.

Most amazing jew boots

***Jurassic Park Chocolate Raptor*** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 02:30 PM

Just adding to the "Hey can you fucking nix it already" crowd.

Seriously, it can't be that difficult to remove, or at the very least, alter to reflect the new sig rules.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Elixir · Local time: May 31, 2006, 02:06 PM

I'd like to know whether or not the sig limit is still a maximum of 50k, because Skills has a 73kb sig.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

**The unmovable stubborn** · May 30, 2006, 08:14 PM

Originally Posted by Elixir

And the point of bumping a sticky is? =[

I don't think anyone cares anymore about the signature checker or dimensions.

Elixir. Buddy. You just responded to a month-old post to tell Acer his concerns are outdated.

Think about that.

IN OTHER NEWS: Still no justice for avatar size queens

How ya doing, buddy?

Little Shithead · May 30, 2006, 08:37 PM

Originally Posted by Elixir

I'd like to know whether or not the sig limit is still a maximum of 50k, because Skills has a 73kb sig.

It depends on what you follow.

I say it's 75k. Some will say 50k.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

**RacinReaver** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 06:57 PM

The opening post in the thread says 50kb.

I also like how pang totally missed the timestamp on Elixir's post while making fun of him for replying to an old post.

I was speaking idiomatically.

***Jurassic Park Chocolate Raptor*** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 08:00 PM

The consensus reached in this thread on the previous pages, if you bothered to read it Lix, is that the new limit is 75k.

Since that conclusion was reached, I've had at least 3 sigs that are over 50k in size, as have plenty of others. It's not hard to conclude based on this that the new limit is 75k.

I'm just complaining because the damn checker hasn't been updated with this yet.

Edit: RR, reading over the last few pages leads me to believe that the new upperbound is 75. Is this or isn't this true? Now I don't even know.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

**RacinReaver** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 07:04 PM

It's not true, as far as I remember it was just people wishing the limit had been increased so that's what they all decided to assume.

I haven't been killing sigs recently because for some reason firefox doesn't report image sizes properly when I look at their properties. =/

How ya doing, buddy?

***Jurassic Park Chocolate Raptor*** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 09:03 PM

Miles said 75k was fine over the phone.

So it's back.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

**RacinReaver** · Local time: May 30, 2006, 08:04 PM

(For now...)

*dramatic chord*

Jam it back in, in the dark.

eriol33 · Local time: Jun 15, 2006, 02:10 AM

I was modded today. So it's fine to put all the text in spoiler tag, right?

How ya doing, buddy?

Kaleb.G · Local time: Jun 14, 2006, 03:12 PM

That looks fine to me now. It was just incredibly long before.

The rules aren't as clear as they should be, but it means that all images and text combined should be no larger than 300px high. The line about not stretching the postbit is what really matters here.

Anyway, since font tags can be used to fit more text in with smaller sizes, I think it should be the same with spoiler tags.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Inhert · Nov 20, 2006, 02:48 PM

there's a lot of sig recently that doesn't follow the sig rules(GoW and Secret of Mana) and apparently it doesn't seem to bother anyone (well anyone but me)

I doN,t really car that they are bigger or are over the kb limit, it's just that I know if me I would have done it, it would have probably been moded...

so all I'm saying is if you want to make some signature rules, at least mods should apply them for everyone...

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

***Bigblah*** · Local time: Nov 21, 2006, 04:00 AM

They sought special permission, and it was granted. Next.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Razikain · 06:42 PM

Hey, just wanted to ask, is this sig alright? I know it's technically three images, but between them they make up far less than a normal sig would. Just wanted to check and be sure. I respect the rules, I do.

Most amazing jew boots

**RacinReaver** · Local time: Dec 12, 2006, 05:59 PM

I think it should be fine.

FELIPE NO

Local time: Dec 13, 2006, 03:07 PM

Yeah, looks alright to me.

The three images are consistent and match, the original two image limit was mostly set because people kept using a dozens of smilies and numerous random images of varying sizes and quality in their sig, when a single image would look much nicer.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

No. Hard Pass. · Local time: Dec 13, 2006, 06:22 AM

Originally Posted by Inhert

there's a lot of sig recently that doesn't follow the sig rules(GoW and Secret of Mana) and apparently it doesn't seem to bother anyone (well anyone but me)

I doN,t really car that they are bigger or are over the kb limit, it's just that I know if me I would have done it, it would have probably been moded...

so all I'm saying is if you want to make some signature rules, at least mods should apply them for everyone...

Originally Posted by BigBlah

They sought special permission, and it was granted. Next.

Hah! Blah went all Quentin Tarantino on us there for a second. "Because you're a fucking chode, that's why. Next."

Jam it back in, in the dark.