|
Originally Posted by LeHah
First off, for reasons beyond me, film score people are idiot snobs that turn their noses up at rerecordings. I personally love some of the Telarc and Silva Screen CDs but a lot of people wave their arms and scream that if its not the original recording, its flawed somehow.
Also, attempts to 'fill the gaps' with new transcription end up very badly. Silva did this for their Conan The Barbarian suite and its a godawful mess.
|
I can only comment on the Sliva "Indy" compilation as that's the only full rerecorded album I own, but it's a mix of both worlds for me. Some parts are transcribed horridly, such as the "Medallion" theme in "Ark Trek" which is missing notes and has wrong harmonisation, resulting in the effect of the orchestra skipping over notes because they were hard (which I know is not the case, but it's still there after eharing the original). On the other hand, I think the rerecording of the End Credits suite from ToD is rich and wonderful, particularly the Love Theme (which, in my opinion, is up with "Balloon Sequence" as best love theme ever). It's slower than the original recording, but I think it works much better.
I think most of the time it's not just the fact it's a rerecording that annoys people. It's when there are blatantly wrong notes, terrible acoustics (which apparetnyl plague Prague recordings) and other issues in addition to questionable interpretations (which in itself isn't really a problem as that's the idea of interpretation). Charles Gerhardt's rerecording of ESB is one example of a brilliant rerecording, one which some argue is superior to the original but of course which others would consider blasphemy.
|
Originally Posted by Minion"
Couldn't a computer basically do all the work for you? Just take the sound track from the movie, minus human voices and translate the wave form into a midi/sheet music?
|
The technology that exists to do so is too sensitive; natural sounds and effects in a proper recording such as reverb, breathing, page turning/chair creaking and general noise don't transcribe at all well, resulting in blobs of notes all over the place. And that raises an important issue that I believe will soon confront the film and classical mediums of music - using technology to make things "easier". I'm not about to say I disrespect Danny Elfman for not arranging or orchestrating or doing anything else to his own music beyond humming it into a tape recorder, nor praising Howard Shore simply because his LotR opus was written, orchestrated and conducted himself. But is it really a good idea for such technology to be used in the mainstream orchestral industry? Sure, people complain that human transcriptions are flawed and don't sound right, but I'd take that over a robot's interpretations of something as sensitive as music. I know you weren't suggesting it for anything more than for lost sheet music/masters, but if and when the technology is developed I doubt it will stop there.
And just to add a little bit more on the subject of lost tapes/music and ToD, the masters are apparently nowhere and I don't know if someone holds the orginal scores. Williams certainly doesn't keep most of his music except for his initial sketches (i.e. before it's sent off to be professionally printed for the orchestra).
I was speaking idiomatically.