 85240 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
| View Poll Results: Lego vs. Lincoln Logs | |||
| Lego |
  
|
32 | 96.97% |
| Lincoln Logs |
  
|
1 | 3.03% |
| Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 9705 Level 32.27 Jul 2006 
|
The choice isn't even close. I had both as a kid, but it's obvious Lincoln Logs are only good for making houses. The most exciting thing was when you switched up the pieces on one wall to insert a window.
Legos, on the other hand, could build anything. Houses were still possible (and they evern had specific window pieces), and you could build cars, spaceships, walls, forests, boats, and other things, plus you had Lego people to play with on your creations. A good Lego creation I would leave together for weeks and play with it, whereas a good Lincoln Log creation would be fun to knock down minutes later. Jam it back in, in the dark.  |
TheKnightOfNee