Rope Snake

Member 9705

Level 32.27

Jul 2006

|
Aug 7, 2006, 04:39 AM
|
#2 of 146
|
|
Originally Posted by Torte
The Matrix: Path of Neo got pretty good critiques from gaming mags, gaming sites, readers, gamers, friends, everyone. It was said to improve on Enter the Matrix (which was an OK game imo) by the bucket load. Well I played through it and during the first chapter there were some cool scenes and the action was fun at times, but then after about 1/3 of the way through, it became a load of nonsense. Level design declined, story declined (yeah I know, story!), action got boring, glitches aplenty, and I only forced myslef through it to witness the 'new' ending.. which was pure stupidity from the once respected director duo.
I can't think of why ppl say it's good, unless they haven't played many games of similar genre. But this doesn't seem to be the case so I'm left with a big wtf in my mind. This game is the worst 3d-gen game I've ever played.
But again, to each his/her own..
|
Wait, wait, wait... people actually liked that game and gave it good reviews? Whaaat? That was a bad game. Finding a new glitch every day didn't help either.
Most amazing jew boots
|