Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Sound Card = 40% more FPS!!!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Relic
and after all this...


Member 945

Level 11.22

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2006, 09:39 AM Local time: Mar 9, 2006, 09:39 AM #1 of 38
The X-Fi is a lot faster than integrated chips at processing EAX and other environmental audio stuff, so it's not much of a stretch to say that it could increase frame rates by 30% or more if you like that stuff. Of course, if you're using integrated sound, you probably don't have EAX enabled in games anyways.

The X-Fi does sound a lot better than the SB Live, though.

How ya doing, buddy?
Relic
and after all this...


Member 945

Level 11.22

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2006, 08:33 PM Local time: Mar 9, 2006, 08:33 PM #2 of 38
Originally Posted by www.sega.co.jp
Even if there was no sound in most games today, I highly doubt framerates would jump by 40%. With most sound formats not even using 5% CPU usage on a 700MHz CPU (mine), it's very slim that any sound format drain 40% of the fps on any game.
The X-Fi isn't meant to accelerate sound decoding. It's designed to accelerate EAX and DirectSound 3D effects...reverb, occlusion, HRTF speaker/headphone compensation, and other fun stuff. Onboard sound chips can't do effects, so they rely on the main processor to handle them instead. No matter what sound chip you use, audio decompression is going to be handled by the main processor.

That said, Creative is notorious for...uh, creative marketing, and the 40% figure is probably very optimistic, especially since most people who are gaming with onboard sound won't be using EAX effects. It's not as big of a stretch as you seem to think it is, though.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
Relic
and after all this...


Member 945

Level 11.22

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2006, 09:49 PM Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 09:49 PM #3 of 38
The X-Fi is not a bad-sounding card, period. They seem to be roughly equal to the lower-end Envy24 cards in terms of sound quality, but with much better gaming performance.

I actually had an AV710 at one time, but I went back to the Audigy 2 Value. The VIA drivers are a pain, UT2004 just doesn't get along well with non-Creative cards, and through my AKG K501 headphones, there just isn't that big of a difference in sound quality. ._.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
- won't you give me a smile...? -

Last edited by Relic; Mar 12, 2006 at 09:53 PM.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk > Sound Card = 40% more FPS!!!

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[DS] Universal DS Homebrew thread. Fucking cheapskates. Elixir Video Gaming 514 Oct 20, 2009 03:15 PM
[News] Iwata Asks Interview Regarding Wii Fit's Sound Design trackjacket General Game Music Discussion 1 Feb 24, 2008 05:27 PM
Sound Card problems LivingDreams Help Desk 2 Mar 18, 2006 10:39 PM
New spoiler method. Bigblah Board Support 76 Mar 15, 2006 11:41 AM
Card advice. Capture and Sound Angelic Diablos Help Desk 0 Mar 11, 2006 10:48 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.