HAY GUYS

Vampiro · Jul 12, 2006, 06:58 AM

They've always had the more "frightening" pokemon on the cover. Good to see the tradition isn't dead.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Vampiro · Jul 12, 2006, 11:31 AM

Yeah, see? They even made Pikachu look menacing.

Quote:

True, but the other Pokémon on previous covers were never this freaky looking.

Nah, that pokemon on Emerald was the freakiest. By far.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Vampiro · Jul 13, 2006, 01:09 PM

Originally Posted by Sin Ansem

Why do they always release Pokemon games on March? I think Fr/Lg and Ru/Sa were released that month too.

End of the fiscal year, I believe. It's an easy way to generate a lot of cash before March 31.

Most amazing jew boots

Vampiro · Jul 13, 2006, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Anyone have any special reason for getting one version over the other, regardless of how trivial it may be? Personally, I always pick the one with Sandshrew in it.

I judge books by their cover, so I'm going for the one with the more badass looking pokemon on the front. LOL SHALLOW

I just don't really care about "this one has this pokemon" anymore. I'm not invested in the series like I once was. I just play them because they're good RPGs.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Vampiro · Jul 15, 2006, 12:37 PM

Wow... that scorpion thing is really fucking lame. At least the two boxart pokemon make up for it.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Vampiro · Dec 19, 2006, 04:32 AM

They were never difficult games, just somewhat lengthy.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?