Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


File this in the "What the Hell?" section...
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Matt
I gotta get my hand on those dragonballz!1


Member 923

Level 24.97

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Feb 6, 2007, 06:56 PM #1 of 9
File this in the "What the Hell?" section...

Quote:
Apple’s Chief Calls for End to Music Copy Protection

The chief executive of Apple Inc., Steven P. Jobs, is calling on the four largest music companies to license their music for distribution without digital anti-piracy protection, shifting away from a nearly four-year-old philosophy that helped steer the iPod music player to worldwide success.

Mr. Jobs’s appeal, expressed Tuesday in a letter posted on Apple’s Web site, arrives as the company, whose iPod dominates MP3 player sales, faces a slew of lawsuits in Europe over so-called digital rights management. France, Sweden and Germany are among the countries that have accused Apple of hurting customers by locking rival players out of its iTunes service.

It is a striking move for Mr. Jobs and for Apple, whose resurgence as a dominant technology company was built on the success of the iPod and iTunes. Introduced in 2003 as the iTunes Music Store, the service charges users 99 cents to download songs from the major labels. Its promise of copyright protection, called FairPlay, helped persuade the four major labels — the EMI Group, Universal, Sony BMG and the Warner Music Group — to allow online sales.

Consumers took to the system in droves, letting Apple capture nearly 75 percent of the portable music player market.

For the first quarter, Apple reported $1 billion in profit, stemming largely from sales of 21 million iPods. Customers have downloaded more than two billion songs from the iTunes store.

Since then, several other providers have devised their own proprietary systems. Microsoft first created its PlaysForSure system, used by a variety of music player makers. But as that system failed to dent iPod sales, the company then turned to its own digital-rights management system for its Zune player last year.

Yet the second-largest online music store, eMusic.com, does not use digital rights management. It heralded its 100 millionth download late last year. Though the store features songs from major artists and what the service claims is 13,000 music labels worldwide, it has not signed agreements with the major music labels.

In his letter, Mr. Jobs outlined three avenues for the future of digital music. One is maintaining the status quo, in which he said customers are “well served” by a variety of choices in players and stores.

Another would see Apple licensing its FairPlay system to other manufacturers, allowing other players to play iTunes songs and vice versa. But he said that system would only complicate enforcement of digital rights management, as myriad companies would have to coordinate software and hardware updates.

Finally, labels could shed digital rights management altogether.
Mr. Jobs pointed out that the vast majority of music bought today — only 10 percent of all music sold last year was through an online store — has no copyright protections and freely allows consumers to copy music to their computers. Attaching digital rights management to music bought online has only limited the number of online music stores, he wrote.

“This is clearly the best alternative for consumers, and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat,” he wrote.

Source
Say what?

Most amazing jew boots
Matt
I gotta get my hand on those dragonballz!1


Member 923

Level 24.97

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Feb 7, 2007, 05:00 PM #2 of 9
What's so confusing? He said in his letter that there's three things that can happen with digital music:
  1. Nothing changes; music labels continue forcing DRM down the throats of the consumers;
  2. Every music store uses the same DRM (and, of course, Jobs would like it to be Apple's DRM software);
  3. Music labels give up the fight for DRM.

Since jHymn stopped working after iTunes 6 was released, I've actually switched gears from mp3 to m4a to allow for some semblance of continuity between my iTunes-purchased music (m4p) and the music I've ripped myself. The problem is that my iTunes music is on one of the two hard drives I can't use right now thanks to my desktop shitting the bed, so, unless iTunes comes up with a way that I can download the music I've purchased and not have to go through miles of red tape for it, I'll be happy.

I feel that music sales would probably increase slightly if there wasn't any DRM. Every music store would basically be on a level playing field, so it would really come down to who has the best presentation and who has the best deals for music. I am hard pressed to believe that kind of market would ever exist, and I would be especially surprised if that is Jobs' ideal market. From a businessman point of view.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I think it's a great way to be in the forefront of an already-pending change in digital music distribution. And obviously this has something to do with what Europe's been calling for Apple to do with iTunes' DRM.

I'm just surprised that Steve Jobs admitted to all of this, even IF he pushed the blame off onto the music labels. It makes a ton of sense to get rid of DRM because of the exact reasons he said:
The majority of music purchased today is on compact discs, and none of those have protection embedded. Why push it on a small portion of an already declining market?


There's nowhere I can't reach.
Matt
I gotta get my hand on those dragonballz!1


Member 923

Level 24.97

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2007, 03:21 PM #3 of 9
More DRM chastising, this time from Music Label executives:

Quote:
Music execs criticise DRM systems

Almost two-thirds of music industry executives think removing digital locks from downloadable music would make more people buy the tracks, finds a survey.

The Jupiter Research study looked at attitudes to Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems in Europe music firms.

Many of those responding said current DRM systems were "not fit for purpose" and got in the way of what consumers wanted to do.

Among all record labels 48% of all executives thought ending DRM would boost download sales - though this was 58% at the larger labels. Outside the record labels 73% of those questioned thought dropping DRM would be a boost for the whole market.

Among all those questioned, 70% believed that the future of downloadable music lay in making tracks play on as many different players as possible. But 40% believed it would take concerted government or consumer action to bring this about.

BBC News


This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion > File this in the "What the Hell?" section...

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.