|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Designer Babies
I was watching the news not long ago and a featurette came on about designer babies...
They esitmate in about 25 years through in vitro fertilization, we may be able to choose features to our kids, like what gender we want, eye, hair color, even intellegence, talents, and disease resitance. Expecting mothers where asked about this and said that they would not want to alter their child, but when asked about the disease resitance, they began to change their mind. Now I am not one to say if this is right or wrong, after all abortion itself is a touchy subject and I am pro-choice. But the disease resitance idea has me worried, today we have a birth rate that is far higher then our death rate, and that imbalance has lead to our over-population, and can only escalate to more, long living people. The planet is in it's current state because little by little we are eating up the world's resources, the world cannot support this many people forever. It didn't seem that long ago that the birth and death rate was close to equal, death is just as important birth for the species survival in the long run. What are your views on this? Jam it back in, in the dark. |
If genetics can prevent real development issues like down syndrom, the I am for it. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
If autism was any worse then that then it would have to be bridging down syndrom or something simiar. Only then would I think genetics would be a good idea to prevent it. How ya doing, buddy? |