eSATA vs. Firewire 800 - Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis

		Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk
eSATA vs. Firewire 800

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.

GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).

eSATA vs. Firewire 800

Thread Tools

Fleshy Fun-Bridge

Hi there!

Member 907

Level 22.05

Mar 2006

Jul 20, 2007, 09:26 PM

#1 of 3

Quote:

firewire 400 is slower than usb 2.0

Actually, due to the architecture of USB and the overhead involved, more often than not FW 400 will spank USB 2.0 in terms of real throughput.

I'd go with the fastist native interface you can use. No adapters. If its FW800, then go with that. If its FW400, go with that.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

---

HAY GUYS