|
Originally Posted by Kaiten
Really foobar2000 is for hard(er)core music listeners who want the best music quality, no fluff, just business; while WinAmp is for novice users (and those who want to play almost any digital music format concievable) plus it's skinnable out of the box. It'll take a while before foobar2000 reaches the format support of WinAmp (but really 99% of all music is still playable on foobar2000, it's those tricky gamerip formats that throw foobar2000).
|
What makes foobar2000 so different that makes it for "hardcore music listeners," and the same to make Winamp for "novice users"?
They do the same thing, at the same level of quality. Why do some people insist they're on two completely different levels.
|
Originally Posted by killmoms
Winamp - not available on my platform.
dbPowerAmp - not available on my platform.
foobar2000 - hideous, and not available on my platform.
Guess I'll stick with iTunes then. Does everything I need.
|
Nobody cares that you think you're special and that you feel the need to gloat that you use a Mac. Thanks for disgracing normal Mac users again.
Jam it back in, in the dark.