Apple's Boot Camp

Considering that enthusiasts already got Windows XP to work on iMacs, this isn't really all that surprising.

Mind as well give everyone the easy solution.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

In fact, actually, some people would say they run Windows even better than PC couterparts.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

There isn't anything stopping you, unless you want some official solution.

Apple probably won't release something to let you do that, though, since they'd be undercutting their own hardware sales.

Cless made that quite clear, if you could get past all the smugness.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Cless

And yes, please build me a Core Duo based system in an attractive, slim, space-saving case with full-featured hardware for half the cost of a Mac. The last thing I want in the world is another ugly, space-hogging mid-tower.

Now, now, beggars can't be choosers here.

This is a very important lesson you'll have to learn.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

No, it's not.

But to think OS X is better than sex, like you appear to be doing, is just as much dreaming.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Originally Posted by MagicalVacation

OSX is sex for the brain

There's equal amounts of things that would make a user confused/wonder why the fuck they chose a way to do something/etc., etc. in OS X, Windows, and Linux.

To deny this would mean you're naïve. Or maybe even stupid.

Quote:

No, let's not go down that road, but you can't argue with millions of dedicated fans worldwide. OSX doesn't get in your face like Windows does. I'm actually a fan of XP as well, before I got OSX I was pretty happy with the way it went, but then it was one virus after the other and things went downhill very fast from there on... OSX is a tool that sits quietly in the background, but does everything you want it to do, very gracefully. Anyways, that's just my two cents.

What the fuck are you even saying.

That may be your $.02, but exchange rates say otherwise.

Most amazing jew boots

I'm not really trampling over your point, either. I just don't understand what you're saying.

Except for the first part, that's just an inane loop-around that really doesn't matter.

FELIPE NO

Originally Posted by PUG1911

So the command line, or terminal in Windows is as important as it is on *nix?

It entirely depends on what you need to do.

If you do programming, you'll need the command line (like you'll need the terminal in *nix,) in order to compile your programs into executables. You can't just double click on a .cpp, .class or perl script and expect it to just run.

I'd pretty much say the command line in Windows is about as equally important as the terminal in *nix OS's (this is especially true with various flavors of Linux moving towards automatic package managment applications, like Synaptics in Ubuntu.)

Quote:

What is AE7? The acronym doesn't ring a bell. But if that's all you use, and they haven't made their program for shit on OSX or Windows, then the only difference is which OS you like using more.

He might be referring to Adobe After Effects 7.

Now, don't throw Final Cut at him, because you can't compare software between Windows and OS X when one of them doesn't have the software.

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?

Originally Posted by Magic

Although he could say that software which serves a purpose on one operating system and isn't available on the other operating system is better than whatever software is available for the other operating system.

Yeah, except he's talking about software available for both OS X and Windows.

I just find it very retarded and unfair to compare software when what you're comparing just doesn't exist on the other platform. You'd have to broaden the topic, first.

Most amazing jew boots