So, I read the
original article, and all I can say is, wow Shorty, you did a shit-ass job, along with CNet, summarizing what the article is even talking about.
The
real point of the
original article was a criticism that Apple does not, and in the case of the Air, did not, do
any means of cost reduction in the production of the Macbook Air. What they're saying is that Apple could have done the internal design better, using much better ways of holding it together, with less screws, and could have reduced the cost of production, which (in traditional theory,) means a lower cost to the consumer.
Not to mention the CNet article is
terrible because it's basically an opinion article
of an opinion article, and he goes wherever the fuck with it because he is, at the very least, a moron.
Sure, some of it may be "Japanese think they're
so superior," but I bet there are engineers in
every country who can agree with their ideas.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.