Star Trek VS Star Wars

I really prefer Star Trek as a whole. The sci fi, intergalactic diplomacy is something that I enjoy. It is understandable that Star Wars would receive more popularity as it is an easier to understand story compared to Star Trek due to the depth difference between the two.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by LeHah

Thats got to be one of the worst things ever said in the history of the internet. It's like your high horse is riding on an even higher horse, with you on top of the two. Get over yourself.

Its not high horse. Im only speaking of what I think. Truly I do believe to a certain extent that Star Trek is more sci-fi than Star Wars. Star Trek takes a lot more time to explain more of its phenomena than Star Wars. Sure Star Trek does have its time where episodes do not have any relation to sci-fi itself but considering the overall universe.. Star Trek does take more time in developing it.

Star Trek expands on its universe far more than Star Wars. Consider how much development the Star Trek writers have expanded on the Vulcans, Romulans, Klingons and Borg versus the development of ewoks, gungans or wookies. Technology is explained in greater depth in Star Trek than in Star Wars.

However you should consider that Star Trek is a tv show thus has a lot more time to expand on these races and go in greater depth than Star Wars was able to. Really though... I would consider Star Trek as a mystery sci-fi as to Star Wars as action sci-fi. What if Star Wars had a tv show? That's an if... who knows?? Maybe they might expand on it but you can't say for sure.

There's nowhere I can't reach.