Marriage is for child-bearing couples only?

Eh. I'm a bigot, so I suppose my opinion doesn't count here simply because I don't wish to argue it. It's simply tradition, is my reasoning. Go ahead and tear it apart. You won't be getting a response.

More power to them.

I'll be voting yes.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Koneko

I have doubts this is a serious bid for a law. Honestly, I think a law that says "You have to have a kid in 3 years or you aint married" is unfair to couples who love each other more than anything in the world but just plain can't have a child. The way it reads too, adoption wouldn't count. I think this is just a way to spark debate (and it worked).

I'm sure they'd have some sort of clause where anyone medically unable to birth a child would be exempt from this law.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Yeah, that is pretty scary. I don't agree with the not having children part.

That's ridiculous.

Come to think of it, I don't agree with anything this law says and I'm not even sure why I made the first post in this thread. Fucking A.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.