|
Originally Posted by Paranoid Schizoid
But religion is their justification, not simply oppression. Others groups who were oppressed in the past didn't go out and explode themselves in bombs to fight oppression.
|
Uhm, yeah. Vietcong.
Given supplies, and enough negative motivation, people will.
The removal of one justification does not mean the removal of all possible justifications.
|
Originally Posted by Like talking to a WallDragon
In this sense I am attack Islam, but not directly since it falls under a broader category.
|
If I said that all beliefs that are not Buddhist must be destroyed, would you find your Atheism under what would appear to be direct attack?
Or, alternatively, if I said that all people from the Southern U.S. should die in a fire, would you think that Bradylama would consider this a
direct threat?
Of course this is a useless side argument. >_>
Most amazing jew boots