|
Quote:
Posted by a lurker
Your argument is "people aren't unique snowflakes." If you think that's a counter to what Electric Sheep was saying, you fail in reading comprehension.
All I'm saying is that, if people behaved as predictably as you figure, we'd have a lot easier time in economics* than we currently do.
|
Really. Are you actually trying to make a point here, or just trolling?
My point is that no, people generally do not have unique individual needs, motivations or feelings. ElectricSheep is trying to make the argument that no two relationships are alike, making it impossible to draw any conclusions from relational trends, and that's just not so. People tend to fall into fairly predictable behavioral patterns. Whether a relationship will hold together after having sex does depend on a few factors, but there's fewer variables than people like to think. No one likes being told how easily they fit in a labeled box, but that's the unvarnished truth.
Every rule has an exception, naturally, but those aberrant couples have such non-standard relationships that they're probably not even asking whether or not sex is going to affect their dynamic.
Incidentally, the advertising industry says that yes, people ARE that predictable. Economics is hard mainly because there are too many stupid people holding positions of authority, not because economists have a hard time figuring out how people will act.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.