The RIAA lawsuit engine is in FULL GEAR.

Do the artists themselves actually condone this sort of nonsense? There comes a time when you need to quit letting your lawyer speak for you and put your damn foot down.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Quote:

Posted by Secret Squirrel
As much as I think the music industry shoots itself in the foot, they do have a point. While most of u-tube is low-grade crap, it's possible that the next big internet fad will originate there, something that'll propel the video and it's author to fame and fortune, partially on the back of a work owned by the RIAA.

Were this to happen, it would be a fantastic amount of free publicity for the song and the artist, which would in turn be gangbusters for the sales of the CD itself. One goofy little internet video made a household name out of an obscure Romanian band that nobody had ever heard about - that "unlicenced" use of Numa Numa was great for business.

No matter how you approach the situation, the RIAA has no footing to stand on. They're shooting themselves in the foot, and wasting an absurd amount of time and money chasing copyright threats that don't exist.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Whatever the song is called. I don't really care enough to look up the actual name.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.