|
Originally Posted by Kostaki
I'll agree that FFTA was trash, but then the GBA doesn't give you too much to work with really. Dragon Quest on the other hand was built on synth music and a simplistic formula and has remained popular over the years. The DS may not be a multimedia champion, but it can produce a Dragon Quest good enough to be a main franchise title.
|
Just because it was built on a simplistic formula doesn't mean it should limit itself to that, as breaking from that has given us something fantastic. Unfortunately, the hardcore fans find this reason enough to berate people who enjoyed a DQ that took full advantage of current hardware and would like to see more epic experiences like it.
|
Quote:
What I find completely interesting here is that Nintendo made the Wii and basically said "F U GRAPHICS" so the Enix division takes Dragon Quest and says "F U MAIN CONSOLES" and deprives everyone of Dragon Quest IX in HD PROGRESSIVE SUPER 45"+ AWESOME ORCHESTRATED ORGAMSIC TV SUPERPOWER. All the while, Dragon Quest Swords for the Wii slips under everyone's radar even though it looks awesome.
|
No need for the hyperbole, people simply don't like missing out on what would be an
even better gaming experience because the developer decides to gimp the title. Surely you agree that DQIX with the hardware resources of the Wii would likely be a much more realized adventure, than a DS title?
|
Quote:
Though I'm wondering what exactly you consider "groundbreaking" these days when literally everything has already been done.
|
Strange that Matsuno deserves to be exalted to the point where anything Ivalice is an instant failure without him, but he's far from amazing. Simply pointing out that your negativity for the new titles is relatively unfounded. This is a bit off topic so I'll drop it.
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?