[Question] Perfect Dark Zero or Halo 2?

Whereas I don't really like Halo 2 at all, I HATE Perfect Dark. It's a fucking terrible game, with some of the worst single player level design I've seen in an FPS in AGES. With the exception of the Bridge stage, it's all uninspired, boring, and terrible. Especially the Jungle Stage, what the HELL is that.

25ish weapons, you say. At least in Halo 2, none of the weapons were completely useless and pointless. The JETPACK is a positive point for you? Uhh, ok. The vehicles in Halo were far more entertaining in variety and actually had a point.

Comparing PD to both Splinter Cell and Battlefield makes you look like a retard, just letting you know. The Multiplayer plays NOTHING like the Battlefield games. There are no important squad tactics. The gameplay is NOTHING alike. The objectives aren't the same, you don't have the emphasis on kits like you do in BF, and so forth. There is NOTHING similar about the two other than they are both FPS games. What the fuck.

And gameplay isn't like Splinter Cell. You don't have to hide in the shadows, it's not a stealth action game, it's not THIRD PERSON, it's not important to accomplish your goals in complete secrecy with the possible exception of one or two stages, ammo conservation and avoiding people cleverly is NOT the main focus, and so on.

This is an insult to both of those game series. Wow.

Armour breaks off satisfyingly? It doesn't do anything but explode in a rather stupid looking mess as soon as it's run out. It doesn't shatter bits off AS you shoot it, it doesn't fray or get worse for wear, it just, explodes. Because we all know Kevlar explodes when it gets shot too much. Hell, that effect just looks ridiculous.

You have bad taste in games. (And I don't even like Halo 2. Holy shit, I can't believe I'm defending it.)

Jam it back in, in the dark.